<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Questions for EPA Tweets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wolfenotes.com/2010/02/vapor-intrusion-questions-for-epa-tweets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wolfenotes.com/2010/02/vapor-intrusion-questions-for-epa-tweets/</link>
	<description>Holding Polluters and Government Accountable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:05:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WolfeNotes.com &#187; Dupont Fined for Coverup of Chemical Health Risks</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfenotes.com/2010/02/vapor-intrusion-questions-for-epa-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-5448</link>
		<dc:creator>WolfeNotes.com &#187; Dupont Fined for Coverup of Chemical Health Risks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfenotes.com/?p=4432#comment-5448</guid>
		<description>[...] But for coverup of Dupont exposing people to chemical vapors in at least 450 homes in Pompton lakes NJ, Dupont gets off scot free.  No EPA enforcement Action - No fines and penalties. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But for coverup of Dupont exposing people to chemical vapors in at least 450 homes in Pompton lakes NJ, Dupont gets off scot free.  No EPA enforcement Action &#8211; No fines and penalties. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WolfeNotes.com &#187; Dupont Caught Exploiting DEP Loophole on Toxic Cleanup Oversight</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfenotes.com/2010/02/vapor-intrusion-questions-for-epa-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-5121</link>
		<dc:creator>WolfeNotes.com &#187; Dupont Caught Exploiting DEP Loophole on Toxic Cleanup Oversight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfenotes.com/?p=4432#comment-5121</guid>
		<description>[...] cleanup oversight would be the better option. Despite our requests -  voiced at public hearings and in writing -  no written rationale was ever provided by EPA to support this EPA policy decision to rely on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cleanup oversight would be the better option. Despite our requests -  voiced at public hearings and in writing -  no written rationale was ever provided by EPA to support this EPA policy decision to rely on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WolfeNotes.com &#187; Jackson&#8217;s Back in Jersey &#8211; for a Pony in Pompton Lakes</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfenotes.com/2010/02/vapor-intrusion-questions-for-epa-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-2952</link>
		<dc:creator>WolfeNotes.com &#187; Jackson&#8217;s Back in Jersey &#8211; for a Pony in Pompton Lakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfenotes.com/?p=4432#comment-2952</guid>
		<description>[...] EPA has tremendous legal power and financial and technical resources under Superfund, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and the Clean Water Act. The fact of the matter is that Jackson&#8217;s visit did nothing to enforce this legal power or deploy EPA resources. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] EPA has tremendous legal power and financial and technical resources under Superfund, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and the Clean Water Act. The fact of the matter is that Jackson&#8217;s visit did nothing to enforce this legal power or deploy EPA resources. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WolfeNotes.com &#187; DEP Protecting Polluters, Not People</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfenotes.com/2010/02/vapor-intrusion-questions-for-epa-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-2690</link>
		<dc:creator>WolfeNotes.com &#187; DEP Protecting Polluters, Not People</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfenotes.com/?p=4432#comment-2690</guid>
		<description>[...] 3) DEP resolves scientific uncertainty to the benefit of the polluter, not the public; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3) DEP resolves scientific uncertainty to the benefit of the polluter, not the public; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WolfeNotes.com &#187; Christie&#8217;s &#8220;Ministry of Truth&#8221; Running Away From DEP Transition Report</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfenotes.com/2010/02/vapor-intrusion-questions-for-epa-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-2672</link>
		<dc:creator>WolfeNotes.com &#187; Christie&#8217;s &#8220;Ministry of Truth&#8221; Running Away From DEP Transition Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfenotes.com/?p=4432#comment-2672</guid>
		<description>[...] Last month, we put out a national alert on this issue. In NJ, we broke the story, and we have written about that issue several times in detail here, most recently on Feb 4  in &#8220;Despite Pompton lakes Tragedy, DEP Weakened and Now Christie Considering Nixing &#8220;Vapor Intrusion&#8221; Requirements&#8221; and again on February 12 &#8220;Questions for EPA Tweets&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last month, we put out a national alert on this issue. In NJ, we broke the story, and we have written about that issue several times in detail here, most recently on Feb 4  in &#8220;Despite Pompton lakes Tragedy, DEP Weakened and Now Christie Considering Nixing &#8220;Vapor Intrusion&#8221; Requirements&#8221; and again on February 12 &#8220;Questions for EPA Tweets&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WolfeNotes.com &#187; Hal Bozarth and Dave Pringle &#8211; perfect together!</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfenotes.com/2010/02/vapor-intrusion-questions-for-epa-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-2635</link>
		<dc:creator>WolfeNotes.com &#187; Hal Bozarth and Dave Pringle &#8211; perfect together!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfenotes.com/?p=4432#comment-2635</guid>
		<description>[...] demise of the industry), so I try to produce original content and generally avoid writing about or criticizing stories than run in the press. Instead, I try to get the stories I write and documents I disclose reported in the mainstream [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] demise of the industry), so I try to produce original content and generally avoid writing about or criticizing stories than run in the press. Instead, I try to get the stories I write and documents I disclose reported in the mainstream [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

