<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NJEF Provides Cover as DEP Runs Away From Christie Freeze on Drinking Water Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wolfenotes.com/2010/03/njef-provides-cover-as-dep-runs-away-from-christie-freeze-on-drinking-water-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wolfenotes.com/2010/03/njef-provides-cover-as-dep-runs-away-from-christie-freeze-on-drinking-water-standard/</link>
	<description>Holding Polluters and Government Accountable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:33:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WolfeNotes.com &#187; Delaware Follows NJ&#8217;s Lead on Drinking Water Standards</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfenotes.com/2010/03/njef-provides-cover-as-dep-runs-away-from-christie-freeze-on-drinking-water-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-6017</link>
		<dc:creator>WolfeNotes.com &#187; Delaware Follows NJ&#8217;s Lead on Drinking Water Standards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfenotes.com/?p=5333#comment-6017</guid>
		<description>[...] NJ&#8217;s Safe Drinking Water Act establishes 3 science based factors upon which to base drinking water standards. Unlike the federal SDWA, NJ law does not include a requirement to consider costs. NJ&#8217;s law is stricter than the federal law in this important regard, which leads to NJ&#8217;s stricter standards, that are primarily health based.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NJ&#8217;s Safe Drinking Water Act establishes 3 science based factors upon which to base drinking water standards. Unlike the federal SDWA, NJ law does not include a requirement to consider costs. NJ&#8217;s law is stricter than the federal law in this important regard, which leads to NJ&#8217;s stricter standards, that are primarily health based.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WolfeNotes.com &#187; &#8220;Immoral Failure To Act&#8221; To Protect Mothers and Infants</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfenotes.com/2010/03/njef-provides-cover-as-dep-runs-away-from-christie-freeze-on-drinking-water-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-3188</link>
		<dc:creator>WolfeNotes.com &#187; &#8220;Immoral Failure To Act&#8221; To Protect Mothers and Infants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfenotes.com/?p=5333#comment-3188</guid>
		<description>[...] not - which is a very good reason why the Christie federal consistency policy is so flawed. As we wrote on March 12: The [NJ Drinking Water Quality] Institute considers three factors when recommending MCLs: health [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not &#8211; which is a very good reason why the Christie federal consistency policy is so flawed. As we wrote on March 12: The [NJ Drinking Water Quality] Institute considers three factors when recommending MCLs: health [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WolfeNotes.com &#187; The Role of Economics At DEP</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfenotes.com/2010/03/njef-provides-cover-as-dep-runs-away-from-christie-freeze-on-drinking-water-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-3051</link>
		<dc:creator>WolfeNotes.com &#187; The Role of Economics At DEP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 01:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfenotes.com/?p=5333#comment-3051</guid>
		<description>[...] For now, I want to emphasize two key issues brought out in quotes in Todd&#8217;s story, both of which I have written about in depth previously (e.g. see this and this): [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For now, I want to emphasize two key issues brought out in quotes in Todd&#8217;s story, both of which I have written about in depth previously (e.g. see this and this): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WolfeNotes.com &#187; Environmental Rollback Legislation Advances</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfenotes.com/2010/03/njef-provides-cover-as-dep-runs-away-from-christie-freeze-on-drinking-water-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-2888</link>
		<dc:creator>WolfeNotes.com &#187; Environmental Rollback Legislation Advances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfenotes.com/?p=5333#comment-2888</guid>
		<description>[...] weaken and result in an across the board rollback of NJ&#8217;s strict air and water pollution, drinking water, toxic waste cleanup, wetlands, pesticides, and at least 40 other public health and environmental [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] weaken and result in an across the board rollback of NJ&#8217;s strict air and water pollution, drinking water, toxic waste cleanup, wetlands, pesticides, and at least 40 other public health and environmental [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

