Home > Uncategorized > DEP Must Stop Spinning On Barnegat Bay TMDL and Impairment

DEP Must Stop Spinning On Barnegat Bay TMDL and Impairment

 Water Quality Standards A State Responsibility Under the Clean Water Act

Jill Lipoti, head of DEP’s water quality program testified today [June 18, 2012] that last year’s Bay monitoring data, quote:

“did not cross any barriers of impairment”.

[Update – here is a very nice DEP chart and powerpoint that proves my point: “state monitoring aligned with state standards”

Source: NJDEP - see above link

Last week, I wrote about DEP’s “Decade of Delay” on pulling the TMDL trigger on Barnegat Bay and our letter demanding US EPA intervention to enforce the Clean Water Act.

Since then, we are pleased that both the Star Ledger (Christie Administration has yet to do enough to stem Barnegat Bay pollution) and the Asbury Park Press (EPA must force the DEP’s hand)  have editorialized in support of that position.

Unforunately, the Asbury Park Press (in both news coverage and editorial) has repeated an error that is based on DEP Press Office mis-statements.

This error is not minor, but goes to the core issue of who is responsible for the flawed water quality standards, monitoring, and assessment methods that have allowed a decade of delay on designating the Bay impaired and adopting  a TMDL cleanup plan.

Specifically, DEP is pointing the finger at EPA, by saying that federal water quality standards are the problem.

Most recently, that DEP lie again is repeated in the APP editorial of August 17 (see: EPA must force the DEP’s hand):

Under Clean Water Act regulations, dissolved oxygen levels above 5 parts per million mean the bay is not impaired. Even the DEP knows that this is not a good measure of the health of the bay. But a DEP spokesman said, essentially, that EPA rules are EPA rules. The state is following the rules. Therefore, the bay is not impaired.

So let me be absolutely clear here – this is all NJ DEP’s responsibility, not the US EPA’s:

1) Under the Clean Water Act, the State DEP has primary responsibility for establishing Surface Water Quality Standards and priorities for the TMDL program.

State standards must assure that all state waters meet the “fishable and swimmable” goals of the Clean Water Act, protect all “existing and designated uses” of those waters, and include “anti degradation” policies to prevent the lowering of water quality in high quality waters.

Those State standards are reviewed and approved by US EPA and become federally enforceable.

The Clean Water Act also requires – every two years – that States (NJ DEP) submit a list of their priorities for TMDL implementation – e.g. which polluted or “impaired” waters are the most important to clean up.

2)  The NJ DEP Surface Water Quality Standards establish the “designated uses” of the Bay

3) The NJ DEP sets the dissolved oxygen, nutrients, and all other standards to assure that they protect the existing and designated uses.

4) The NJ DEP establishes the water quality monitoring network and sampling methods to measure compliance with Surface Water Quality Standards.

5) The NJ DEP establishes the water quality assessment methods to apply monitoring data to determine if a waterbody attains the water quality standards or is “impaired”.

The DEP states all that very clearly on the surface water quality standards page on their website – perhaps the DEP Press Office should read this:

Surface Water Quality Criteria

The surface water quality criteria established for each of the different stream classifications in the SWQS are numerical estimates of constituent concentrations, including toxic pollutants, that are protective of the designated uses of the surface waters of the State. Narrative criteria describe instream conditions to be attained/maintained or avoided. The SWQS also contain technical and general policies, including antidegradation policies and nutrient policies, to ensure that the designated uses are adequately protected.

The Department has recently developed a Nutrient Criteria Enhancement Plan, required under USEPA’s National Nutrient Policy. This document explains the Department’s approach to developing and enhancing the existing SWQS nutrient criteria and policies to protect designated uses of all New Jersey’s surface waters, including saline waters (estuarine and marine). Nutrient criteria development requires an understanding of the causal relationships between nutrient over-enrichment, various response variables, and documented impacts on attainment of designated and existing uses of New Jersey waters. This Plan outlines the steps to support nutrient criteria development, including monitoring and data collection; research of causal relationships; selection of appropriate indicators of use impairment;development of new assessment methodologies;development of new/enhanced criteria; and promulgation of the new criteria through amendments to the SWQS.

Repeat: the “Nutient Criteria Enhancement Plan” was written and adopted by NJ DEP. All flaws in standards, monitoring, and water quality assessment under that plan are the responsibility of the NJ DEP.

The 5 year old  US EPA “Nutrient Policy” makes it very clear that this is a State – not a federal – responsibility:

Today, EPA is encouraging all states, territories, and authorized tribes to accelerate their efforts and give priority to adopting numeric water quality standards for nitrogen and phosphorus pollution or numeric translators for narrative standards for all waters in states and territories that contribute nitrogen and phosphorus loadings to our waterways. Incremental progress can be an effective way to accelerate progress. If a state needs to implement numeric criteria for nitrogen and phosphorus pollution incrementally, EPA strongly recommends that states first adopt numeric water quality standards for priority waters—that is, waters at greatest risk of nitrogen and phosphorus pollution (such as those identified through the EPA-USGS SPARROW modeling effort) or of greatest consequence (such as drinking water sources). States may also choose to prioritize their actions for waters where sufficient information is available to move quickly to adopt numeric criteria in the near-term. The state’s nutrient criteria plan should reflect the state’s approach to setting standards for its waters and include schedules for adopting those standards.

Here are the NJ DEP State Surface Water Quality Standards:

DEP SWQS Dissolved Oxygen and Nutrient criteria “Narrative Standard” (NJAC 7:9B-1.14 (d) – @ p.27 – 28)

Except as due to natural conditions, nutrients shall not be allowed in concentrations that render the waters unsuitable for the existing or designated uses due to objectionable algal densities, nuisance aquatic vegetation, diurnal fluctuations in dissolved oxygen or pH indicative of excessive photosynthetic activity, detrimental changes to the composition of aquatic ecosystems, or other indicators of use impairment caused by nutrients. 

As we have repeatedly written, there are a sequence of steps required before DEP can implement and enforce this “narrative standard” for nutrients.

  • The DEP must apply existing monitoring data, in light of known causal mechanisms (called biological stressor-response indicators) and develop what are called “numeric thresholds” for determining exactly what “objectionable algal densities” “nuisance aquatic vegetation“;”excessive photosynthetic activity“; and “detrimental changes to the composition of aquatic ecosystems” are.
  • This is not difficult and it doses not require more data – DEP did this in a few months for phosphorus eutrophication in NJ freshwater in 2003.
  • DEP must then adopt those numeric thresholds as revisions to the current EPA approved “Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment” document. In the alternate, DEP could promulgate these impairment thresholds as “Technical Manuals” or as regulations.
  • DEP must then apply those thresholds in light of current data to make “impairment determination” and submit that determination and the basis for it to EPA for review and approval.
  • In addition to the “impairment” determination, DEP must modify its EPA approved “2 Year TMDL Priority Schedule” to include Barnegat Bay

This sequence of steps begins the TMDL process.

It is all under NJ DEP control.

Don’t be fooled by the finger pointing by DEP’s press office.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:
  1. No comments yet.
Comment pages
1 2 3 4 21991
  1. April 27th, 2014 at 03:50 | #1
  2. April 25th, 2015 at 02:05 | #2
  3. May 19th, 2015 at 02:47 | #3
  4. May 21st, 2015 at 11:19 | #4
  5. May 22nd, 2015 at 06:35 | #5
  6. May 22nd, 2015 at 19:24 | #6
  7. May 26th, 2015 at 02:34 | #7
  8. May 28th, 2015 at 00:07 | #8
  9. May 28th, 2015 at 00:09 | #9
  10. May 28th, 2015 at 00:10 | #10
  11. May 28th, 2015 at 00:18 | #11
  12. May 28th, 2015 at 00:19 | #12
  13. May 28th, 2015 at 00:19 | #13
  14. May 28th, 2015 at 07:09 | #14
  15. May 29th, 2015 at 11:07 | #15
  16. May 29th, 2015 at 11:47 | #16
  17. May 29th, 2015 at 13:08 | #17
  18. May 29th, 2015 at 18:42 | #18
  19. May 30th, 2015 at 22:43 | #19
  20. May 30th, 2015 at 23:58 | #20
  21. June 1st, 2015 at 03:15 | #21
  22. June 1st, 2015 at 12:10 | #22
  23. June 1st, 2015 at 12:24 | #23
  24. June 2nd, 2015 at 06:53 | #24
  25. June 2nd, 2015 at 12:18 | #25
  26. June 2nd, 2015 at 13:23 | #26
  27. June 2nd, 2015 at 16:47 | #27
  28. June 2nd, 2015 at 20:30 | #28
  29. June 2nd, 2015 at 21:28 | #29
  30. June 3rd, 2015 at 02:25 | #30
  31. June 3rd, 2015 at 03:24 | #31
  32. June 3rd, 2015 at 05:25 | #32
  33. June 3rd, 2015 at 07:21 | #33
  34. June 3rd, 2015 at 12:40 | #34
  35. June 3rd, 2015 at 17:43 | #35
  36. June 4th, 2015 at 04:03 | #36
  37. June 4th, 2015 at 09:57 | #37
  38. June 4th, 2015 at 11:13 | #38
  39. June 4th, 2015 at 16:57 | #39
  40. June 5th, 2015 at 00:11 | #40
  41. June 5th, 2015 at 07:08 | #41
  42. June 5th, 2015 at 14:47 | #42
  43. June 5th, 2015 at 23:39 | #43
  44. June 6th, 2015 at 06:25 | #44
  45. June 6th, 2015 at 10:20 | #45
  46. June 6th, 2015 at 15:07 | #46
  47. June 6th, 2015 at 23:27 | #47
  48. June 7th, 2015 at 08:06 | #48
  49. June 7th, 2015 at 08:20 | #49
  50. June 7th, 2015 at 11:03 | #50
  51. June 8th, 2015 at 00:01 | #51
  52. June 9th, 2015 at 07:33 | #52
  53. June 12th, 2015 at 03:33 | #53
  54. June 12th, 2015 at 03:35 | #54
  55. June 14th, 2015 at 06:24 | #55
  56. June 14th, 2015 at 21:55 | #56
  57. June 16th, 2015 at 04:58 | #57
  58. June 16th, 2015 at 12:15 | #58
  59. June 16th, 2015 at 13:31 | #59
  60. June 16th, 2015 at 16:20 | #60
  61. June 16th, 2015 at 20:53 | #61
  62. June 17th, 2015 at 02:01 | #62
  63. June 18th, 2015 at 14:00 | #63
  64. June 18th, 2015 at 23:40 | #64
  65. June 19th, 2015 at 11:26 | #65
  66. June 19th, 2015 at 20:15 | #66
  67. June 20th, 2015 at 01:43 | #67
  68. June 20th, 2015 at 04:04 | #68
  69. June 20th, 2015 at 07:22 | #69
  70. June 20th, 2015 at 18:46 | #70
  71. June 21st, 2015 at 01:06 | #71
  72. June 21st, 2015 at 15:42 | #72
  73. June 21st, 2015 at 23:47 | #73
  74. June 22nd, 2015 at 01:48 | #74
  75. June 22nd, 2015 at 03:25 | #75
  76. June 22nd, 2015 at 08:04 | #76
  77. June 22nd, 2015 at 13:06 | #77
  78. June 22nd, 2015 at 18:33 | #78
  79. June 23rd, 2015 at 01:16 | #79
  80. June 23rd, 2015 at 03:42 | #80
  81. June 23rd, 2015 at 06:07 | #81
  82. June 23rd, 2015 at 08:03 | #82
  83. June 23rd, 2015 at 08:27 | #83
  84. June 23rd, 2015 at 17:20 | #84
  85. June 23rd, 2015 at 17:47 | #85
  86. June 23rd, 2015 at 20:01 | #86
  87. June 23rd, 2015 at 22:19 | #87
  88. June 24th, 2015 at 04:35 | #88
  89. June 24th, 2015 at 04:45 | #89
  90. June 24th, 2015 at 07:57 | #90
  91. June 24th, 2015 at 12:32 | #91
  92. June 24th, 2015 at 13:09 | #92
  93. June 24th, 2015 at 15:11 | #93
  94. June 24th, 2015 at 17:14 | #94
  95. June 24th, 2015 at 19:23 | #95
  96. June 24th, 2015 at 19:41 | #96
  97. June 24th, 2015 at 23:09 | #97
  98. June 25th, 2015 at 08:07 | #98
  99. June 25th, 2015 at 08:13 | #99
  100. June 25th, 2015 at 16:53 | #100
  101. June 25th, 2015 at 19:02 | #101
  102. June 25th, 2015 at 20:31 | #102
  103. June 25th, 2015 at 20:55 | #103
  104. June 26th, 2015 at 11:52 | #104
  105. June 26th, 2015 at 11:53 | #105
  106. June 26th, 2015 at 17:38 | #106
  107. June 26th, 2015 at 23:40 | #107
  108. June 27th, 2015 at 05:48 | #108
  109. June 27th, 2015 at 13:14 | #109
  110. June 27th, 2015 at 16:44 | #110
  111. June 27th, 2015 at 16:45 | #111
  112. June 27th, 2015 at 17:17 | #112
  113. June 27th, 2015 at 20:50 | #113
  114. June 28th, 2015 at 05:48 | #114
  115. June 28th, 2015 at 19:45 | #115
  116. June 29th, 2015 at 21:35 | #116
  117. July 1st, 2015 at 10:30 | #117
  118. July 1st, 2015 at 17:06 | #118
  119. July 2nd, 2015 at 01:56 | #119
  120. July 2nd, 2015 at 02:14 | #120
  121. July 3rd, 2015 at 06:31 | #121
  122. July 3rd, 2015 at 06:54 | #122
  123. July 3rd, 2015 at 10:40 | #123
  124. July 3rd, 2015 at 18:43 | #124
  125. July 4th, 2015 at 00:40 | #125
  126. July 4th, 2015 at 07:07 | #126
  127. July 4th, 2015 at 08:02 | #127
  128. July 4th, 2015 at 18:03 | #128
  129. July 4th, 2015 at 18:52 | #129
  130. July 4th, 2015 at 18:54 | #130
  131. July 4th, 2015 at 21:23 | #131
  132. July 5th, 2015 at 03:18 | #132
  133. July 5th, 2015 at 04:50 | #133
  134. July 5th, 2015 at 14:01 | #134
  135. July 5th, 2015 at 16:02 | #135
  136. July 5th, 2015 at 20:42 | #136
  137. July 5th, 2015 at 21:39 | #137
  138. July 6th, 2015 at 03:21 | #138
  139. July 6th, 2015 at 03:26 | #139
  140. July 6th, 2015 at 16:17 | #140
  141. July 7th, 2015 at 01:30 | #141
  142. July 7th, 2015 at 05:30 | #142
  143. July 7th, 2015 at 09:03 | #143
  144. July 7th, 2015 at 14:27 | #144
  145. July 7th, 2015 at 18:18 | #145
  146. July 7th, 2015 at 21:43 | #146
  147. July 8th, 2015 at 15:38 | #147
  148. July 8th, 2015 at 15:57 | #148
  149. July 8th, 2015 at 19:53 | #149
  150. July 8th, 2015 at 20:24 | #150
  151. July 8th, 2015 at 21:03 | #151
  152. July 9th, 2015 at 01:07 | #152
  153. July 9th, 2015 at 07:24 | #153
  154. July 9th, 2015 at 08:01 | #154
  155. July 9th, 2015 at 08:01 | #155
  156. July 9th, 2015 at 08:02 | #156
  157. July 9th, 2015 at 15:07 | #157
  158. July 9th, 2015 at 15:50 | #158
  159. July 9th, 2015 at 16:11 | #159
  160. July 9th, 2015 at 16:13 | #160
  161. July 9th, 2015 at 18:28 | #161
  162. July 9th, 2015 at 20:19 | #162
  163. July 9th, 2015 at 21:26 | #163
  164. July 9th, 2015 at 23:23 | #164
  165. July 10th, 2015 at 19:26 | #165
  166. July 10th, 2015 at 20:30 | #166
  167. July 10th, 2015 at 23:29 | #167
  168. July 11th, 2015 at 01:08 | #168
  169. July 11th, 2015 at 08:18 | #169
  170. July 11th, 2015 at 08:21 | #170
  171. July 11th, 2015 at 08:22 | #171
  172. July 11th, 2015 at 08:22 | #172
  173. July 11th, 2015 at 13:02 | #173
  174. July 11th, 2015 at 15:01 | #174
  175. July 11th, 2015 at 15:12 | #175
  176. July 11th, 2015 at 15:20 | #176
  177. July 11th, 2015 at 21:28 | #177
  178. July 12th, 2015 at 02:10 | #178
  179. July 12th, 2015 at 04:33 | #179
  180. July 12th, 2015 at 05:27 | #180
  181. July 12th, 2015 at 06:01 | #181
  182. July 12th, 2015 at 12:33 | #182
  183. July 12th, 2015 at 22:27 | #183
  184. July 12th, 2015 at 23:36 | #184
  185. July 12th, 2015 at 23:58 | #185
  186. July 13th, 2015 at 02:15 | #186
  187. July 13th, 2015 at 03:44 | #187
  188. July 13th, 2015 at 08:18 | #188
  189. August 30th, 2015 at 12:04 | #189
  190. May 14th, 2017 at 04:23 | #190
  191. May 4th, 2019 at 15:49 | #191
  192. July 18th, 2019 at 13:24 | #192
  193. September 17th, 2019 at 20:05 | #193
  194. May 26th, 2021 at 17:20 | #194
  195. June 24th, 2021 at 13:15 | #195
You must be logged in to post a comment.