Home > Uncategorized > A Plan For Coastal Planning

A Plan For Coastal Planning

Senate Committee to Conduct Hearing Today on Coastal Planning and Sandy Rebuild

NJ Needs a Comprehensive Strategy for Reducing Vulnerability to Climate Change – Phase I: Sea- Level Rise and Coastal Storms

NJ Is The Only State in The Northeast With No Climate Change Plan

The Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee meets today in Toms River at 10 am to conduct a hearing – “to hear testimony from invited witnesses on issues surrounding coastal planning and rebuilding in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy. ” You can listen live here .

We studied regional planning in Grad school, spent 13 years as an environmental planner at DEP, helped draft the Highlands Act, written many times about coastal planning issues, and in addition to strong criticism of the Christie administration, have made positive recommendations, see:

We attended all of the Committee’s hearings, and signed up to testify at the hearing in Atlantic Highlands that was designed to take testimony from the public, but were blocked from speaking by the Chairman Sarlo, so of course we were not invited to testify today.

On Saturday, we suggested Massachusetts coastal program as a model.

So today, to supplement prior posts, below are the State of Maryland’s Coastal planning and climate change adaptation program key recommendations.

The Senate Environment Committee has looked to Maryland as a model for stormwater management and to the Chesapeake Bay Clean Water Act TMDL program as  a model for Barnegat Bay, so I thought they might want to consider Maryland’s  climate change program too, especially given the fact that NJ is the only state in the Northeast with  no climate change adaptation plan. 

We’ll attend the hearing and report what went down later today or tomorrow.

Here are Maryland’s key recommendations: 

Comprehensive Strategy for Reducing Maryland’s Vulnerability to Climate Change – Phase I: Sea- Level Rise and Coastal Storms

  • Take action now to protect human habitat and infrastructure from future risks. Require the integration of coastal erosion, coastal storm, and sea-level rise adaptation and response planning strategies into existing state and local policies and programs. Develop and implement state and local adaptation policies (i.e., protect, retreat, abandon) for vulnerable public and private sector infrastructure. Strengthen building codes and construction techniques for new infrastructure and buildings in vulnerable coastal areas.
  • Minimize risks and shift to sustainable economies and investments. Develop and implement long-range plans to minimize the economic impacts of sea-level rise to natural resource-based industries. Establish an independent Blue Ribbon Advisory Committee to advise the state of the risks that climate change poses to the availability and affordability of insurance. Develop a Maryland Sea-Level Rise Disclosure and Advisory Statement to inform prospective coastal property purchasers of the potential impacts that climate change and sea-level rise may pose to a particular piece of property. Recruit, foster, and promote market opportunities related to climate change adaptation and response.
  • Guarantee the safety and well-being of Maryland’s citizens in times of foreseen and unforeseen risk . Strengthen coordination and management across agencies responsible for human health and safety. Conduct health impact assessments to evaluate the public health consequences of climate change and projects and/or policies related to sea-level rise. Develop a coordinated plan to assure adequacy of vector-borne surveillance and control programs.
  • Retain and expand forests, wetlands, and beaches to protect us from coastal flooding. Identify high priority protection areas and strategically and cost-effectively direct protection and restoration actions. Develop and implement a package of appropriate regulations, financial incentives, and educational, outreach, and enforcement approaches to retain and expand forests and wetlands in areas suitable for long-term survival. Promote andsupport sustainable shoreline and buffer area management practices.
  • Give state and local governments the right tools to anticipate and plan for sea-level rise and climate change. Strengthen federal, state, local, and regional observation systems to improve the detection of biological, physical, and chemical responses to climate change and sea-level rise. Update and maintain state-wide sea-level rise mapping, modeling, and monitoring products. Utilize new and existing educational, outreach, training and capacity building programs to disseminate information and resources related to climate change and sea-level rise.
  • State and local governments must commit resources and time to assure progress. Develop state-wide sea-level rise planning guidance to advise adaptation and response planning at the local level. Develop and implement a system of performance measures to track Maryland’s success at reducing its vulnerability to climate change and sea-level rise. Pursue the development of adaptation strategies to reduce climate change vulnerability among affected sectors, including agriculture, forestry, water resources, aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, and human health.
Categories: Uncategorized Tags:
  1. Finnegan1
    February 16th, 2013 at 10:36 | #1

    Re: Sea Bright Beach Replenishment
    There seemed to be quite a rush to pump sand back on to the beach clubs of Sea Bright. While I understand the economics of restoring the beaches & amenities of the real Shore towns(Belmar, Pt. Pleasant, LBI, etc.) where daily & seasonal public beach traffic is so important, I cannot understand how handfuls of $10,000/season beach cabanas makes much of a contribution to the state as a whole. Especially considering that we great unwashed only got access to Sea Bright Beach Club’s Federally funded shores last year. I have inquired of local, county & state elected officials and the response has been the same as my question on who might be held accountable for leaving NJ Transit rail stock to be flooded during Sandy in Hoboken & Kearny. No responses.

  2. February 18th, 2013 at 09:45 | #2

    This should really go after 10/29/12’s “A Dirge to McHarg and Mumford” but I want more people to know about this development. Operation Blessing has rebuilt some homes in Breezy Point NY to the status quo ante – an act of zoning insanity, inviting repeat victimization of the owners. Here’s the URL to the story: http://www.ny1.com/content/top_stories/177201/volunteer-home-builders-are-a-real–blessing–for-breezy-point-residents. This is the same organization which gave a replacement mobile home to a tornado victim last year in Harrisburg, Illinois. This organization has no scientific understanding of these natural hazards, or mitigation by downzoning & better construction. Last year I complained to my Congressperson about the corruption in post-disaster white-collar jobs, keeping me unemployed: unqualified fatcat companies get secret contracts, and unqualified volunteers undercut even the cheapest should-be contributors. Both groups commit grave building errors which won’t be corrected until the next such disaster. Gov. Cuomo proposed a buyout plan in his State of the State Address; Operation Blessing’s rebuilding defeats it for those misguided homeowners and keeps them in danger for the next Sandy. If I could, I’d email you a copy of the letter I sent my Congressperson, going into more detail. I wish you’d write about this. This is the biggest soapbox I have.

  1. No trackbacks yet.
You must be logged in to post a comment.