Home > Uncategorized > Obama Seeks To Revive Cap and Trade Legislation (Not Really, That’s Just Cover)

Obama Seeks To Revive Cap and Trade Legislation (Not Really, That’s Just Cover)

EPA Regulatory Strategy Likely To Share Many Aspects of Failed Cap and Trade Approach

 “The Huge Mistake” In Regulatory Drag?

Science and Politics Shifting – More Ambitious Program Required

Dr. James Hansen speaks at protest outside NRDC NYC HQ (11/30/09)

 

“Cap and trade with offsets would guarantee that we pass climate tipping points, locking in climate disasters for our children. Cap and trade benefits only Wall Street and polluters, sacrificing humanity and nature for their profits.” Dr. Jim Hansen Nov. 30, 2009

 

In light of President Obama’s State of the Union address, I thought I’d dust off prior posts on the failed cap and trade bill Obama just recommended that Congress reconsider and enact.

As expected, building on remarks on climate change in his Inaugural speech, Obama’s SOTU called on Congress to enact cap and trade legislation:

The good news is, we can make meaningful progress on this issue while driving strong economic growth. I urge this Congress to pursue a bipartisan, market-based solution to climate change, like the one John McCain and Joe Lieberman worked on together a few years ago. But if Congress won’t act soon to protect future generations, I will. I will direct my Cabinet to come up with executive actions we can take, now and in the future, to reduce pollution, prepare our communities for the consequences of climate change, and speed the transition to more sustainable sources of energy.

Surely Obama realizes that cap and trade is dead on arrival in Congress, particularly in the Tea Party Republican dominated House. So, my sense is that this was just a throw away line, to provide cover for his “executive actions”.

(for inside the beltway perspective, e.g. Obama “threat”, see WaPo:  In State of the Union, Obama threatens Congress on climate change)

Before touching on the cap and trade issues, I must note that Obama’s vague treatment of climate change emission reductions is in strark contrast to his specific proposals for more fossil energy.

Obama has retained his “all of the above” energy policy, which stresses “economic growth”, “energy security” and “low costs”, which are fundamental barriers to real reform.

Resources are finite and significant emissions reductions are required – so “all of the above” can’t work. We simply don’t have the money or the time to do everything. Energy costs much rise signifincatly to provide incentives to reduce consumption and make the revolutionary scale of required investments in renewable power profitable. Economic growth is not sustainable with finite resources and will guarantee we suffer catastrophic and irreversible climate impacts.

Building on his “all of the above” policy, in contrast to vague programmatic commitments on emissions reductions and renewables, Obama was very specific about commitments on more fossil fuel production, which will conflcit with or undermine his emsisions reductions and renewable energy goals:

After years of talking about it, we are finally poised to control our own energy future. We produce more oil at home than we have in 15 years. We have doubled the distance our cars will go on a gallon of gas, and the amount of renewable energy we generate from sources like wind and solar – with tens of thousands of good, American jobs to show for it. We produce more natural gas than ever before – and nearly everyone’s energy bill is lower because of it. And over the last four years, our emissions of the dangerous carbon pollution that threatens our planet have actually fallen. […]

In the meantime, the natural gas boom has led to cleaner power and greater energy independence. That’s why my Administration will keep cutting red tape and speeding up new oil and gas permits. But I also want to work with this Congress to encourage the research and technology that helps natural gas burn even cleaner and protects our air and water.

Nonetheless, aside from these problems that flow from Obama’s energy policy and subordination of all other policy objectives to economic growth, it still is very important that people understand the fatal flaws in cap and trade.

Most importantly, that’s because the cornerstone of the President’s “executive action” is very likely to be a complex regulatory scheme under the Clean Air Act to regulate emissions from over 500 antiquated existing coal power plants.

I’ve written about that several times and will be writing in depth about this set of issues in the near future.

But for now, I leave you with a December Report by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) (see:  Closing the Power Plant Carbon Pollution Loophole: Smart Ways the Clean Air Act Can Clean Up America’s Biggest Climate Polluters 

That NRDC Report is essentially the same politics and policy of cap and trade, in regulatory form.

Right off the bat, the NRDC Report is misleading, because it describes just one of several regulatory tools available to EPA under the Clean Air Act, Section 111(d).

But even the Bush Administration’s EPA laid out a much broader set of options, in a 2008 “Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking”, which stated:

SUMMARY: This advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) presents information relevant to, and solicits public comment on, how to respond to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. EPA. In that case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) authorizes regulation of greenhouse gases (GHGs) because they meet the definition of air pollutant under the Act. In view of the potential ramifications of a decision to regulate GHGs under the Act, the notice reviews the various CAA provisions that may be applicable to regulate GHGs, examines the issues that regulating GHGs under those provisions may raise, provides information regarding potential regulatory approaches and technologies for reducing GHG emissions, and raises issues relevant to possible legislation and the potential for overlap between legislation and CAA regulation. 

NRDC fails to learn the political and policy lessons of their prior support for cap and trade and EPA’s regulatory strategy under the Clean Air Act – i.e. a modest program based on pre-movement political feasibility, limited to low cost, flexible, state autonomy, modest emissions reductions, incremental, technocratic, industry expertise/modeling driven approach.

Here’s how NRDC describes the situation:

NRDC’s proposal is designed to give power plant owners freedom to choose how they would achieve the required emission reductions, giving credit for increases in energy efficiency and electricity generation using renewable sources and allowing emission-rate averaging among fossil fuel−fired power plants. States would also have the freedom to design their own approach, as long as it achieved equivalent emission reductions. 

The analysis demonstrates that this recommended approach would reduce power plants’ carbon pollution in an efficient and affordable way. 

Establishing such CO2 emission standards now will boost investments in energy efficiency and will give the power industry the investment certainty it needs to avoid billions of dollars of stranded investment in obsolete power plants.

Lots of freedom there – freedom to pollute and freedom for captured state regulators to look the other way.

And how does a 50 year old antiquated coal power plant possibly have stranded costs?

NRDC signed off on that not only politically, but actually own it via a litigation settlement agreement:

Ruling in the New York case, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals then ordered EPA to reconsider its refusal to curb carbon emissions from power plants. In 2011 the Supreme Court confirmed EPA’s responsibility to address carbon pollution from power plants under Section 111 in another climate change decision, American Electric Power v. Connecticut.33

In 2011 the parties reached a settlement agreement in the New York case with a schedule for EPA to act on CO2 standards for both new and existing power plants.34 Although EPA has fallen behind the settlement schedule, the agency proposed a carbon pollution standard for new plants in April 2012. This is an important step toward EPA’s meeting its statutory duties, but action is still required on the existing power plants, the largest contributor of carbon pollution in America.

In their Report, NRDC sets a very low bar for greenhouse gas emissions (power plant “reductions” are just 12.5% by the year 2025, using a 1990 baseline – see graph on page 4)

NJ’s 2007 Global Warming Response Act law is more aggressive, sestting a larger 20% emission reduction goal five years sooner (by 2020) (same 1990 baseline). NJ has already achieved that 2020 goal, based exclusively on economic factors: the economic recession and fuel switching from coal and oil to cheap natural gas.

Nationally, we assume a similar economic response to emissions, plus additional reductions from coal plants that close due to the high costs of compliance with new EPA mercury, SOx and NOx  regulations. So, it is not clear exactly whether and how much the NRDC strategy will reduce power plant emissions at all, compared with business as usual (all that complexity is conveniently buried in an industry and EPA model – which is another technical and political problem with the NRDC strategy).

The scope of what NRDC recommends as the cornerstone of the EPA regulatory strategy is also troubling. It repeats mistakes of the past as well, because power plant sector is only 40% of emissions – other sectors must be included, and it is not clear exactly how the NRDC proposed regulatory strategy and emission credits could achieve this non-power sector reductions.

The NRDC emissions reduction goal and reduction schedule is not based on science, which tells us that much deeper and faster emission reductions are required to avoid the worst and most catastrophic global warming impacts.

The NRDC modest effort comes as climate change activists are ramping up demands and movement politics, with a huge protest scheduled for Sunday, Feb, 17.

Thus, with the science suggesting the need for even more urgent and deeper cuts and the politics shifting, NRDC should have been much more ambitious and set a much higher bar.

Much more to come on this, but until I get a chance to lay out the arguments, watch this superb short video by two EPA lawyers, with over 40 years of experience. They explain exactly why cap and trade is fatally flawed.

So, until I get a chance to write more in depth,  read the NRDC Report and then

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:
  1. No comments yet.
Comment pages
1 3 4 5 25522
  1. October 9th, 2014 at 16:43 | #1
  2. October 11th, 2014 at 21:42 | #2
  3. May 19th, 2015 at 14:17 | #3
  4. May 20th, 2015 at 18:10 | #4
  5. May 26th, 2015 at 00:16 | #5
  6. May 27th, 2015 at 23:40 | #6
  7. May 27th, 2015 at 23:43 | #7
  8. May 27th, 2015 at 23:50 | #8
  9. May 27th, 2015 at 23:51 | #9
  10. May 28th, 2015 at 06:37 | #10
  11. May 29th, 2015 at 10:41 | #11
  12. May 29th, 2015 at 10:58 | #12
  13. May 29th, 2015 at 11:07 | #13
  14. May 29th, 2015 at 16:36 | #14
  15. May 30th, 2015 at 20:19 | #15
  16. May 30th, 2015 at 22:40 | #16
  17. May 30th, 2015 at 22:41 | #17
  18. May 31st, 2015 at 00:48 | #18
  19. June 1st, 2015 at 02:49 | #19
  20. June 1st, 2015 at 02:50 | #20
  21. June 1st, 2015 at 05:49 | #21
  22. June 1st, 2015 at 06:04 | #22
  23. June 1st, 2015 at 07:41 | #23
  24. June 1st, 2015 at 09:43 | #24
  25. June 1st, 2015 at 11:56 | #25
  26. June 2nd, 2015 at 06:22 | #26
  27. June 2nd, 2015 at 06:34 | #27
  28. June 2nd, 2015 at 08:31 | #28
  29. June 2nd, 2015 at 11:35 | #29
  30. June 2nd, 2015 at 13:49 | #30
  31. June 2nd, 2015 at 18:01 | #31
  32. June 2nd, 2015 at 18:37 | #32
  33. June 2nd, 2015 at 23:27 | #33
  34. June 3rd, 2015 at 04:33 | #34
  35. June 3rd, 2015 at 04:38 | #35
  36. June 3rd, 2015 at 05:00 | #36
  37. June 3rd, 2015 at 05:04 | #37
  38. June 3rd, 2015 at 06:19 | #38
  39. June 3rd, 2015 at 10:08 | #39
  40. June 3rd, 2015 at 16:42 | #40
  41. June 4th, 2015 at 07:22 | #41
  42. June 4th, 2015 at 21:44 | #42
  43. June 5th, 2015 at 12:33 | #43
  44. June 5th, 2015 at 13:43 | #44
  45. June 6th, 2015 at 21:06 | #45
  46. June 7th, 2015 at 05:50 | #46
  47. June 7th, 2015 at 08:43 | #47
  48. June 7th, 2015 at 09:45 | #48
  49. June 7th, 2015 at 14:56 | #49
  50. June 7th, 2015 at 19:40 | #50
  51. June 7th, 2015 at 20:45 | #51
  52. June 7th, 2015 at 20:49 | #52
  53. June 7th, 2015 at 23:11 | #53
  54. June 8th, 2015 at 04:18 | #54
  55. June 8th, 2015 at 21:29 | #55
  56. June 9th, 2015 at 06:22 | #56
  57. June 9th, 2015 at 11:22 | #57
  58. June 10th, 2015 at 12:15 | #58
  59. June 10th, 2015 at 12:25 | #59
  60. June 10th, 2015 at 22:01 | #60
  61. June 10th, 2015 at 23:45 | #61
  62. June 11th, 2015 at 01:31 | #62
  63. June 12th, 2015 at 03:24 | #63
  64. June 12th, 2015 at 03:24 | #64
  65. June 13th, 2015 at 15:15 | #65
  66. June 14th, 2015 at 21:25 | #66
  67. June 14th, 2015 at 22:11 | #67
  68. June 15th, 2015 at 02:09 | #68
  69. June 15th, 2015 at 03:07 | #69
  70. June 15th, 2015 at 03:13 | #70
  71. June 15th, 2015 at 13:18 | #71
  72. June 15th, 2015 at 13:25 | #72
  73. June 16th, 2015 at 02:50 | #73
  74. June 16th, 2015 at 09:28 | #74
  75. June 16th, 2015 at 11:43 | #75
  76. June 16th, 2015 at 15:19 | #76
  77. June 16th, 2015 at 15:28 | #77
  78. June 16th, 2015 at 16:41 | #78
  79. June 17th, 2015 at 15:33 | #79
  80. June 17th, 2015 at 20:40 | #80
  81. June 18th, 2015 at 00:49 | #81
  82. June 18th, 2015 at 18:25 | #82
  83. June 18th, 2015 at 22:34 | #83
  84. June 19th, 2015 at 13:55 | #84
  85. June 20th, 2015 at 08:39 | #85
  86. June 21st, 2015 at 03:42 | #86
  87. June 21st, 2015 at 22:26 | #87
  88. June 22nd, 2015 at 17:38 | #88
  89. June 23rd, 2015 at 03:06 | #89
  90. June 24th, 2015 at 09:18 | #90
  91. June 25th, 2015 at 07:27 | #91
  92. June 25th, 2015 at 07:37 | #92
  93. June 25th, 2015 at 13:58 | #93
  94. June 25th, 2015 at 16:18 | #94
  95. June 25th, 2015 at 16:24 | #95
  96. June 26th, 2015 at 02:24 | #96
  97. June 26th, 2015 at 03:34 | #97
  98. June 26th, 2015 at 11:05 | #98
  99. June 26th, 2015 at 15:00 | #99
  100. June 26th, 2015 at 15:48 | #100
  101. June 27th, 2015 at 05:19 | #101
  102. June 27th, 2015 at 11:40 | #102
  103. June 27th, 2015 at 14:59 | #103
  104. June 27th, 2015 at 21:05 | #104
  105. June 27th, 2015 at 23:18 | #105
  106. June 28th, 2015 at 03:49 | #106
  107. June 28th, 2015 at 18:53 | #107
  108. June 29th, 2015 at 00:46 | #108
  109. June 29th, 2015 at 05:17 | #109
  110. June 29th, 2015 at 21:15 | #110
  111. June 30th, 2015 at 16:18 | #111
  112. July 1st, 2015 at 09:16 | #112
  113. July 1st, 2015 at 12:14 | #113
  114. July 1st, 2015 at 13:53 | #114
  115. July 1st, 2015 at 16:10 | #115
  116. July 1st, 2015 at 16:15 | #116
  117. July 1st, 2015 at 16:35 | #117
  118. July 1st, 2015 at 16:37 | #118
  119. July 2nd, 2015 at 01:01 | #119
  120. July 2nd, 2015 at 01:11 | #120
  121. July 2nd, 2015 at 01:18 | #121
  122. July 2nd, 2015 at 12:23 | #122
  123. July 2nd, 2015 at 12:34 | #123
  124. July 2nd, 2015 at 12:52 | #124
  125. July 3rd, 2015 at 06:13 | #125
  126. July 3rd, 2015 at 08:31 | #126
  127. July 3rd, 2015 at 09:04 | #127
  128. July 3rd, 2015 at 09:35 | #128
  129. July 3rd, 2015 at 09:38 | #129
  130. July 3rd, 2015 at 18:42 | #130
  131. July 3rd, 2015 at 19:31 | #131
  132. July 3rd, 2015 at 19:37 | #132
  133. July 3rd, 2015 at 19:40 | #133
  134. July 3rd, 2015 at 23:26 | #134
  135. July 3rd, 2015 at 23:41 | #135
  136. July 4th, 2015 at 00:13 | #136
  137. July 4th, 2015 at 06:13 | #137
  138. July 4th, 2015 at 19:04 | #138
  139. July 4th, 2015 at 20:53 | #139
  140. July 4th, 2015 at 21:13 | #140
  141. July 4th, 2015 at 21:31 | #141
  142. July 5th, 2015 at 05:43 | #142
  143. July 5th, 2015 at 16:49 | #143
  144. July 5th, 2015 at 20:12 | #144
  145. July 5th, 2015 at 20:25 | #145
  146. July 5th, 2015 at 22:07 | #146
  147. July 6th, 2015 at 03:17 | #147
  148. July 6th, 2015 at 07:31 | #148
  149. July 6th, 2015 at 07:50 | #149
  150. July 6th, 2015 at 07:51 | #150
  151. July 6th, 2015 at 09:28 | #151
  152. July 6th, 2015 at 14:41 | #152
  153. July 6th, 2015 at 15:53 | #153
  154. July 6th, 2015 at 16:13 | #154
  155. July 6th, 2015 at 23:05 | #155
  156. July 7th, 2015 at 01:01 | #156
  157. July 7th, 2015 at 04:25 | #157
  158. July 7th, 2015 at 07:44 | #158
  159. July 7th, 2015 at 08:28 | #159
  160. July 7th, 2015 at 09:08 | #160
  161. July 7th, 2015 at 10:48 | #161
  162. July 7th, 2015 at 14:00 | #162
  163. July 7th, 2015 at 14:34 | #163
  164. July 7th, 2015 at 14:42 | #164
  165. July 7th, 2015 at 14:47 | #165
  166. July 7th, 2015 at 16:58 | #166
  167. July 7th, 2015 at 17:37 | #167
  168. July 7th, 2015 at 17:50 | #168
  169. July 7th, 2015 at 19:41 | #169
  170. July 7th, 2015 at 20:13 | #170
  171. July 7th, 2015 at 22:50 | #171
  172. July 7th, 2015 at 22:56 | #172
  173. July 8th, 2015 at 02:17 | #173
  174. July 8th, 2015 at 02:25 | #174
  175. July 8th, 2015 at 03:15 | #175
  176. July 8th, 2015 at 04:41 | #176
  177. July 8th, 2015 at 06:44 | #177
  178. July 8th, 2015 at 08:08 | #178
  179. July 8th, 2015 at 10:07 | #179
  180. July 8th, 2015 at 13:42 | #180
  181. July 8th, 2015 at 13:43 | #181
  182. July 8th, 2015 at 13:58 | #182
  183. July 8th, 2015 at 17:31 | #183
  184. July 8th, 2015 at 19:59 | #184
  185. July 9th, 2015 at 00:19 | #185
  186. July 9th, 2015 at 00:34 | #186
  187. July 9th, 2015 at 01:55 | #187
  188. July 9th, 2015 at 02:28 | #188
  189. July 9th, 2015 at 03:09 | #189
  190. July 9th, 2015 at 03:12 | #190
  191. July 9th, 2015 at 05:37 | #191
  192. July 9th, 2015 at 07:43 | #192
  193. July 9th, 2015 at 12:33 | #193
  194. July 9th, 2015 at 14:41 | #194
  195. July 9th, 2015 at 15:53 | #195
  196. July 9th, 2015 at 21:40 | #196
  197. July 10th, 2015 at 03:11 | #197
  198. July 10th, 2015 at 03:42 | #198
  199. July 10th, 2015 at 04:02 | #199
  200. July 10th, 2015 at 04:05 | #200
  201. July 10th, 2015 at 09:27 | #201
  202. July 10th, 2015 at 09:52 | #202
  203. July 10th, 2015 at 09:52 | #203
  204. July 10th, 2015 at 09:53 | #204
  205. July 10th, 2015 at 09:53 | #205
  206. July 10th, 2015 at 09:53 | #206
  207. July 10th, 2015 at 09:53 | #207
  208. July 10th, 2015 at 09:54 | #208
  209. July 10th, 2015 at 10:41 | #209
  210. July 10th, 2015 at 12:41 | #210
  211. July 10th, 2015 at 13:17 | #211
  212. July 10th, 2015 at 15:34 | #212
  213. July 10th, 2015 at 15:56 | #213
  214. July 10th, 2015 at 16:15 | #214
  215. July 10th, 2015 at 19:30 | #215
  216. July 10th, 2015 at 21:52 | #216
  217. July 10th, 2015 at 22:23 | #217
  218. July 11th, 2015 at 00:17 | #218
  219. July 11th, 2015 at 04:15 | #219
  220. July 11th, 2015 at 06:00 | #220
  221. July 11th, 2015 at 06:01 | #221
  222. July 11th, 2015 at 06:01 | #222
  223. July 11th, 2015 at 08:23 | #223
  224. July 11th, 2015 at 13:57 | #224
  225. July 11th, 2015 at 14:04 | #225
  226. July 11th, 2015 at 14:30 | #226
  227. July 11th, 2015 at 14:47 | #227
  228. July 11th, 2015 at 15:02 | #228
  229. July 11th, 2015 at 19:00 | #229
  230. July 11th, 2015 at 21:32 | #230
  231. July 11th, 2015 at 23:19 | #231
  232. July 12th, 2015 at 01:51 | #232
  233. July 12th, 2015 at 05:11 | #233
  234. July 12th, 2015 at 08:51 | #234
  235. July 12th, 2015 at 11:59 | #235
  236. July 12th, 2015 at 12:45 | #236
  237. July 12th, 2015 at 19:30 | #237
  238. July 12th, 2015 at 23:02 | #238
  239. July 12th, 2015 at 23:16 | #239
  240. July 13th, 2015 at 03:48 | #240
  241. July 13th, 2015 at 12:11 | #241
  242. July 13th, 2015 at 12:51 | #242
  243. July 13th, 2015 at 13:06 | #243
You must be logged in to post a comment.