Home > Uncategorized > NJ DEP Mosquito Control Program Destroying Coastal Wetlands

NJ DEP Mosquito Control Program Destroying Coastal Wetlands

 DEP Destroying Ability To Remove Pollution That Is Killing Barnegat Bay

Excavating Ponds and Digging Ditches Harms Wetlands Functions

When will the destructive mosquito control program be shut down by DEP? 

coastal wetlands

Barry concluded that just as in 1927, people died because of cynical decisions made by shortsighted politicians drawing on bad science.  ~~~ The Most Ambitious Environmental Lawsuit Ever  (NY Times, 10/4/14)

The New York Times is running a must read story today about a lawsuit against the oil and gas industry for destroying the Gulf Of Mexico’s coastal wetlands  systems that, among other things, protect New Orleans – read the whole thing: The Most Ambitious Environmental Lawsuit Ever.

The Times tells the all too typical story of politics, science and power: how the power of the oil & gas industry and political corruption combined to destroy coastal wetlands systems and undermine the State’s Coastal Management Plan and restoration program.

Basically, the canals dug by the oil & gas industry have vastly accelerated erosion and the industry has failed to comply with permits that require restoration to prevent that erosion.

There are strong parallels to NJ:

  • the oil & gas industry virtually owns the state government and political apparatus
  • the Governor has incredible power
  • environmental groups never mounted a serious challenge to the development that is causing the problems
  • natural coastal ecosystems were destroyed by unregulated industry greed
  • Gov’s Bobby Jindal & Chris Christie share the same pro-corporate anti-regulatory ideology

The difference is that here in NJ, it’s the land development lobby that killed the coast, not the oil & gas industry (at least not directly – oil & gas are causing climate change that will destroy the coast eventually).

So, what does all this have to do with a NJ DEP mosquito control program?

While reading the Times story I was struck by a metaphor used to describe the process of erosion: industry dug canals serve as an ice pick on a melting block of ice.

While not remotely on the scale or severity of what is going on in the Gulf, a similar erosion process is underway in NJ’s coastal wetlands systems.

The primary threats involve destruction of wetlands by development, conversion & alteration of natural wetlands systems, and sea level rise & inundation.

But in this case, the problems are not caused by the developers or sea level rise or natural processes, but are caused by a DEP approved program.

One surprising facet of that coastal wetland erosion process was described in a recent research paper I read:

The environmental services provided by wetlands that fringe the coast are at risk from sea level rise. In this regard it is important to understand the current extent of services wetlands provide, such as nutrient cycling-retention, to better plan for the future and related environmental and land use changes. This was designed to enhance our understanding of the nitrogen uptake, burial and removal services provided by coastal wetlands in Barnegat Bay. By quantifying the proportion of the watershed’s nitrogen load that is processed by vegetation, buried, and most importantly, removed by microbial denitrification per unit area, resource managers and policy makers will have needed information to evaluate, protect and enhance wetlands, while maintaining benefits for water quality, as well as for wildlife habitat, water flow and biodiversity. The objective of the study is to help inform resource managers of the value of wetland-watershed linkages, understand nutrient sinks, and how sea level rise may alter these critical environmental services. […]

The objective of this study was to estimate the removal of dissolved nitrogen via denitrification in the tidal wetlands of Barnegat Bay. In addition, we compared these removal rates to burial rates and inputs to the Bay from a previous study. 

The study is part of DEP’s Barnegat Bay research agenda, focusing on issues related to nutrient pollution.

It is well known that natural wetlands systems remove nitrogen from the system and thereby protect water quality:

Source:

Source:

But in reading the DEP sponsored study, I was surprised by a major finding that a DEP approved mosquito management program was having serious negative impacts on the structure and function of coastal wetlands systems, including a dramatic impact on their ability to reduce nitrogen loads to Barnegat Bay:

Open Marsh Water Management (OMWM), where interior vegetated marsh is converted to shallow ponds. Over 10,000 acres of salt marsh has been physically altered with OMWM in Barnegat Bay, thus making it important to measure the effect of OMWM ponds on denitrification. …  Overall, salt marsh denitrification has the potential to remove approximately 13 to 33% of the incoming estimated N load entering the Bay (7.0 x 105 kg/yr). Both sediment burial and denitrification can sequester or remove between 91 and 111% of the incoming load. Tidal marshes within the Barnegat system are an important component of the ecosystem and help to remove a substantial amount of N entering the bay.

Salt marshes have a long history of management, such as diking, draining, salt hay farming, ditching, and more recently, Open Marsh Water Management (OMWM). OMWM has been adopted in several Atlantic coastal states to control mosquitoes by excavating ponds and connecting ditches (pond radials) on the marsh platform. While ponds are natural salt marsh features, OMWM increases the density of ponds across the marsh and places ponds in areas where natural ponds may not have formed. In addition, ponds may be established in areas that have been previously grid ditched (Figure 12). Grid ditching has reduced the occurrence of natural ponds (Adamowicz and Roman 2005), but the effects of creating ponds at a high density in areas previously grid ditched is unknown. The mosquito control commissions operating in Barnegat Bay have been applying OMWM since the 1970s. Ocean County Mosquito has installed over 9000 ponds across 12,000 acres in Barnegat Bay over the last ~30 years (OCM, per comm.). It is unclear how a high density of ponds in areas that were once vegetated marsh will affect N removal.

Denitrification rates were lower in the OMWM ponds (72±4 mol N m-2 hr-1) than the vegetated marsh sites (113±23 mol N m-2 hr-1 ,Table 6 and Figure 13) which were similar to control locations (102±19 mol N m-2 hr-1).  [My Note: that is a 36% reduction in nitrogen removal rate]

  • OMWM appears to lower the overall rate of denitrification during peak warm months. Anareal survey of the extent of OMWM and rates within these sub-systems needs to beundertaken to better determine the impact on the overall budget of N to the Bay.

These negative findings are consistent with a prior 2000 Rutgers CRSSA study: “Quantifying the habitat and spatial pattern of New Jersey (USA) salt marshes under different management regimes.”

The findings from that decade old 2000 study were presented to DEP in July 2010:

Source: Lathrop, July 2010 powerpoint presentation to NJ DEP

Source: Lathrop, July 2010 powerpoint presentation to NJ DEP

So, given these findings, when will the destructive mosquito control program be shut down by DEP? 

[PS – and after DEP shuts down the physical destruction, maybe they can next stop the chemical warfare:

helicopter1

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:
  1. No comments yet.
Comment pages
  1. April 23rd, 2015 at 00:44 | #1
  2. April 23rd, 2015 at 08:44 | #2
  3. April 28th, 2015 at 00:09 | #3
  4. June 12th, 2015 at 09:02 | #4
  5. June 12th, 2015 at 15:48 | #5
  6. June 14th, 2015 at 03:22 | #6
  7. June 15th, 2015 at 00:46 | #7
  8. June 16th, 2015 at 08:20 | #8
  9. June 17th, 2015 at 00:31 | #9
  10. June 17th, 2015 at 09:01 | #10
  11. June 17th, 2015 at 09:29 | #11
  12. June 17th, 2015 at 11:51 | #12
  13. June 17th, 2015 at 16:46 | #13
  14. June 18th, 2015 at 00:41 | #14
  15. June 18th, 2015 at 03:48 | #15
  16. June 18th, 2015 at 07:11 | #16
  17. June 18th, 2015 at 08:34 | #17
  18. June 18th, 2015 at 10:35 | #18
  19. June 18th, 2015 at 15:55 | #19
  20. June 18th, 2015 at 21:12 | #20
  21. June 18th, 2015 at 21:45 | #21
  22. June 19th, 2015 at 04:26 | #22
  23. June 19th, 2015 at 08:34 | #23
  24. June 19th, 2015 at 14:16 | #24
  25. June 19th, 2015 at 15:36 | #25
  26. June 19th, 2015 at 17:04 | #26
  27. June 20th, 2015 at 05:49 | #27
  28. June 20th, 2015 at 09:06 | #28
  29. June 20th, 2015 at 14:51 | #29
  30. June 20th, 2015 at 16:25 | #30
  31. June 20th, 2015 at 22:43 | #31
  32. June 20th, 2015 at 22:44 | #32
  33. June 21st, 2015 at 11:13 | #33
  34. June 22nd, 2015 at 16:37 | #34
  35. June 23rd, 2015 at 14:24 | #35
  36. June 23rd, 2015 at 19:35 | #36
  37. June 25th, 2015 at 05:31 | #37
  38. June 25th, 2015 at 05:38 | #38
  39. June 25th, 2015 at 08:46 | #39
  40. June 25th, 2015 at 18:07 | #40
  41. June 26th, 2015 at 09:05 | #41
  42. June 26th, 2015 at 11:38 | #42
  43. June 27th, 2015 at 11:51 | #43
  44. June 27th, 2015 at 23:30 | #44
  45. June 28th, 2015 at 01:53 | #45
  46. June 28th, 2015 at 08:16 | #46
  47. June 28th, 2015 at 17:31 | #47
  48. June 28th, 2015 at 17:46 | #48
  49. June 30th, 2015 at 22:57 | #49
  50. July 1st, 2015 at 04:27 | #50
  51. July 1st, 2015 at 15:19 | #51
  52. July 2nd, 2015 at 11:27 | #52
  53. July 2nd, 2015 at 11:37 | #53
  54. July 2nd, 2015 at 11:44 | #54
  55. July 3rd, 2015 at 07:19 | #55
  56. July 3rd, 2015 at 07:21 | #56
  57. July 3rd, 2015 at 07:23 | #57
  58. July 3rd, 2015 at 08:06 | #58
  59. July 3rd, 2015 at 18:22 | #59
  60. July 3rd, 2015 at 18:26 | #60
  61. July 3rd, 2015 at 18:32 | #61
  62. July 3rd, 2015 at 23:15 | #62
  63. July 4th, 2015 at 04:14 | #63
  64. July 4th, 2015 at 04:51 | #64
  65. July 4th, 2015 at 16:28 | #65
  66. July 4th, 2015 at 17:28 | #66
  67. July 4th, 2015 at 18:44 | #67
  68. July 4th, 2015 at 19:06 | #68
  69. July 4th, 2015 at 19:54 | #69
  70. July 4th, 2015 at 20:01 | #70
  71. July 4th, 2015 at 21:25 | #71
  72. July 5th, 2015 at 12:33 | #72
  73. July 5th, 2015 at 17:13 | #73
  74. July 5th, 2015 at 19:41 | #74
  75. July 5th, 2015 at 20:00 | #75
  76. July 6th, 2015 at 01:21 | #76
  77. July 6th, 2015 at 06:32 | #77
  78. July 6th, 2015 at 15:25 | #78
  79. July 6th, 2015 at 18:04 | #79
  80. July 6th, 2015 at 18:19 | #80
  81. July 7th, 2015 at 00:47 | #81
  82. July 7th, 2015 at 02:03 | #82
  83. July 7th, 2015 at 07:23 | #83
  84. July 7th, 2015 at 09:34 | #84
  85. July 7th, 2015 at 19:18 | #85
  86. July 8th, 2015 at 07:13 | #86
  87. July 8th, 2015 at 14:10 | #87
  88. July 8th, 2015 at 14:33 | #88
  89. July 8th, 2015 at 16:53 | #89
  90. July 9th, 2015 at 02:56 | #90
  91. July 9th, 2015 at 02:57 | #91
  92. July 9th, 2015 at 10:07 | #92
  93. July 9th, 2015 at 13:43 | #93
  94. July 9th, 2015 at 20:39 | #94
  95. July 9th, 2015 at 20:41 | #95
  96. July 9th, 2015 at 20:42 | #96
  97. July 9th, 2015 at 20:42 | #97
  98. July 9th, 2015 at 20:42 | #98
  99. July 9th, 2015 at 21:16 | #99
  100. July 10th, 2015 at 02:36 | #100
  101. July 10th, 2015 at 08:12 | #101
  102. July 10th, 2015 at 09:00 | #102
  103. July 10th, 2015 at 09:57 | #103
  104. July 10th, 2015 at 11:23 | #104
  105. July 10th, 2015 at 11:44 | #105
  106. July 10th, 2015 at 12:03 | #106
  107. July 10th, 2015 at 20:52 | #107
  108. July 11th, 2015 at 01:13 | #108
  109. July 11th, 2015 at 01:14 | #109
  110. July 11th, 2015 at 01:15 | #110
  111. July 11th, 2015 at 01:15 | #111
  112. July 11th, 2015 at 03:17 | #112
  113. July 11th, 2015 at 11:04 | #113
  114. July 11th, 2015 at 13:43 | #114
  115. July 11th, 2015 at 13:51 | #115
  116. July 11th, 2015 at 20:18 | #116
  117. July 11th, 2015 at 20:28 | #117
  118. July 11th, 2015 at 20:45 | #118
  119. July 11th, 2015 at 21:49 | #119
  120. July 12th, 2015 at 02:48 | #120
  121. July 12th, 2015 at 11:55 | #121
  122. July 12th, 2015 at 15:46 | #122
  123. July 13th, 2015 at 08:08 | #123
  124. August 12th, 2015 at 23:01 | #124
  125. July 21st, 2016 at 11:51 | #125
You must be logged in to post a comment.