Home > Uncategorized > Jersey Girls Just Wanna Have Fun!

Jersey Girls Just Wanna Have Fun!

This is What Political Posturing Looks Like

Partisan Loyalty and Gov. Christie’s Presidential Aspirations Come First

Assemblywoman Caroline Casagrande and state Sen. Jennifer Beck (both R-Monmouth) pose  (Source: MaryAne Spoto, NJ Advacne media)

Assemblywoman Caroline Casagrande and state Sen. Jennifer Beck (both R-Monmouth) pose
(Source: MaryAne Spoto, NJ Advance media)

Real Jersey Girls don’t want to publicly embarrass their Governor and ask for real solutions that could kill offshore LNG with the stroke of a pen.

They’d rather strike poses, bask in the limelight, and get praise from the press and coastal groups for being “ocean champions” and crap like that.

Plus, it’s all Obama’s fault anyway, right?

Why put any heat on Governor Christie right now?

I mean, he’s got a Presidential campaign to run, and the Big Oil & Gas Boyz who write those big checks would not be favorably impressed by a Governor exercising his veto power to kill an energy project, nor would Republicans in Congress or the right wing Republican base primary voters.

Especially stuff like this: (SR 120)

WHEREAS, Upon his veto in 2011 of the 2008 LNG project, Governor Christie recognized that “LNG facilities . . . are not the answer forNew Jersey’s needs . . . ,” and he indicated, moreover, that his “administration will oppose any application for liquefied natural  gas” since it is inappropriate for New Jersey to assume the environmental and other risks associated with LNG facility projects, when the benefits to the State are weak, at best; and

WHEREAS, Because the construction and operation of the proposed Port Ambrose deepwater LNG terminal would endanger New Jersey’s coastal and ocean environments, as well as its shipping, fishing, and coastal tourism industries, while providing no benefit to the State or its residents, and because the authorization and approval of this port project would be contrary to the goals and positions espoused by government officials at both the federal and  State level, it is altogether fitting and proper for federal and State officials to use their respective authority to prevent the construction and operation of this LNG port facility off of New Jersey’s coast;  now, therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED by the Senate of the State of New Jersey:

1. This House opposes the construction and operation of the Port Ambrose deepwater liquefied natural gas terminal off the coast of New Jersey, and it urges the United States Coast Guard, the federal Maritime Administration, and any other federal entity  engaged in review of the Port Ambrose project to disapprove of the project, and thereby prohibit its construction off of New Jersey’s coastline.

2. In the event that the Port Ambrose deepwater port project is  approved by federal officials, this House urges the Governor of the  State of New Jersey to veto the project, pursuant to the authority granted to governors of adjacent coastal states under the federal “Deepwater Port Act of 1974,” 33 U.S.C. s.1501 et seq.,

PS – oops, I almost forgot this – Real Jersey Girls enjoy a little cheerleading for the Big Boy too:

beck2

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:
  1. Drake
    January 16th, 2015 at 17:39 | #1

    I’m coming to a similar conclusion, regarding Jennifer Beck, in search of environmental leadership on the Republican side. Her comments at the Port Ambrose series seemed somehow scripted by someone cropped closely to the reins of Clean Ocean Action. To be sure, her comments on their own were fine and idealistic. But then again, why hasn’t she picked up the phone and called Governor Christie and let him know that her continued support for his political ambitions is conditioned on a veto of Port Ambrose, which would be in Monmouth County’s “clean ocean zone.”

    Taking the cue from Wolfenotes, I posted on my FB on this query, where I’m following other subjects that might dovetail with yours:

    https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100007542496010

    Michael Drake

  1. January 12th, 2015 at 23:38 | #1
  2. April 27th, 2015 at 16:41 | #2
  3. May 17th, 2015 at 19:12 | #3
  4. June 9th, 2015 at 07:18 | #4
  5. June 12th, 2015 at 09:35 | #5
  6. June 12th, 2015 at 15:48 | #6
  7. June 20th, 2015 at 18:43 | #7
  8. June 21st, 2015 at 04:02 | #8
  9. June 21st, 2015 at 13:38 | #9
  10. June 23rd, 2015 at 13:23 | #10
  11. June 23rd, 2015 at 22:50 | #11
  12. July 26th, 2016 at 13:36 | #12
You must be logged in to post a comment.