Memo To Gov. Murphy – The “Green” Honeymoon Is Over

June 18th, 2018 No comments

A First Step on A Path Forward To Implement Your Climate Promises

Gov. Florio’s Executive Order No. 8 Provides A Model

Not 6 months into his tenure, Gov. Murphy’s energy, climate and environmental policy agenda he campaigned on is in disarray and the Legislature has seized control.

I won’t rehash all the details in this post, but the Bergen Record’s recent scathing editorial “A string of losses for the environment” pretty much summed things up:

Big Corporate Polluters 2 — New Jersey, its people and its environment 0.

This is the score we might have expected were Gov. Chris Christie still in office.

On the environmental front, Gov. Murphy has yet to revoke Gov. Christie’s rollback Executive Orders #1 – 4 and Christie appointments still serve as Executive Directors of the Pinelands Commission and Highlands Council.

Murphy’s DEP Commissioner Catherine McCabe took 6 months to get confirmed. As we’ve been noting here, McCabe retained many Christie DEP managers and continuity with Christie DEP policies, and has done virtually nothing during her tenuous tenure other than issue press releases and PR stunts that echo Gov. Christie’s initiatives.

On energy policy, Senator Sweeney rammed a nuclear bailout bill through the legislature that seriously compromised the Gov.’s commitment to a 100% renewable energy pledge.

On climate policy, the Gov.’s policy agenda is limited to rejoining the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (more on that soon) and directing BPU to revise the Christie Energy Master Plan to promote 3,500 MW of off shore wind.

Murphy has no governing experience and has surrounded himself with either recycled Corzine hacks or young staffers with no Trenton or regulatory experience. Instituitionalizing legislative control over Murphy’s DEP, Senate President Sweeney’s Legislative aide Eric Wachter was installed as DEP Chief Of Staff and Assemblyman McKeon’s legislative aide was installed as Director of DEP’s Office of Government Relations. (see DEP Org Chart)

In that leadership vacuum, the Pinelands pipeline is seeking DEP permit extensions, DEP decisions on controversial pipelines under Raritan Bay (Williams) and the Delaware watershed (PennEast) are pending, and a proposed new fossil fueled power plant on the banks of NJ’s finest trout stream in the heart of the NJ Highlands has emerged.

Given these awful developments, we thought this brief note on the mechanics of exercising Gubernatorial leadership might help.

Gov. Murphy probably does not know – and lame NJ environmental groups are certainly not letting him know – that former Gov. Florio, among others, provides stunning parallels and a directly relevant model to address the situation he faces right now.

Politically, like Gov. Murphy now faces on pipelines, energy, and climate, upon assuming office in 1990, Florio was faced with stiff environmental and public opposition to garbage incinerators.

On reversing prior policy, like Murphy inherited bad policies from Gov. Christie, Florio’s predecessor, the Kean Administration had promoted a pro-incineration policy. To implement that Kean policy,  DEP approved 21 County Solid Waste plans and incinerator permits for more than $3 billion of new incineration projects. These were all bond financed and/or approved by DEP and/or BPU. Worse, the legislature had effectively deregulated BPU economic review of incinerator procurement contracts to promote the industry (i.e the “McEnroe” law).

In terms of commitments, like Murphy, Florio had made promises to environmental groups – who had endorsed him in the campaign – to develop an aggressive solid waste policy that promoted recycling and discouraged incineration.

Florio not only had to reverse the Kean policy and use DEP power to over-rule and embarrass 21 County Freeholder boards, he had to claw back prior DEP planning, permitting and financing approvals – for $3 BILLION in investment.

This is actually MORE difficult to do than for Murphy to kill pending fossil infrastructure projects.

Here’s how Florio did that – and how Murphy can tackle very similar problems on energy infrastructure and climate policy.

On April 6, 1990 (well before Earth Day and in his administration’s “first 100 days”), Gov. Florio issued Executive Order #8, which established a “Emergency Solid Waste Task Force” and laid out a public planning process going forward. PLEASE READ THE WHOLE THING!

Here’s the core provision that put teeth in the policy:

4. During the Task Force’s deliberations over the next 120 days, the following shall apply:

a. The Department of Environmental Protection shall not issue a final approval of any solid waste management plan that sites increases the capacity of or approves financing for waste-to-energy resource recovery facilities;

b. The Department of Environmental Protection shall not issue a approval of Preliminary or Final Environmental and Health Impact Statements for any waste-to-energy resource recovery site or facility;

c. The Department of Environmental Protection shall not issue tentative or final approval of any solid waste facility engineering design now pending or hereafter submitted for any waste-to-energy resource recovery facilities;

d. The Department of Environmental Protection, the Board of Public Utilities and the Division of Local Government Services within the Department of Community Affairs shall not, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 13:1E-136 et seq., issue any approval or conditional approval of any previously submitted proposed contract for the design, financing, construction, operation or maintenance of a waste-to-energy resource recovery facility; and

e. No State agency, commission or organization shall approve the issuance of debt or extend financing to any person or entity for use in planning, designing, acquiring, constructing, operating or maintaining a waste-to-energy resource recovery facility.

Gov. Murphy could issue a similar Executive Order establishing an Emergency Climate Change and Energy Task Force tied to the BPU Energy Master Plan revision process and the DEP Climate mitigation and adaptation planning & regulatory process (including RGGI).

The Order could impose a moratorium on any DEP and BPU approvals of any fossil  energy infrastructure approvals, such as the Pinelands, PennEast and Williams pipeline and the recently proposed new gas plant in the Highlands.

Problem solved.

So why aren’t NJ’e environmental groups advocating this aggressive approach?

That is more than ironic, as they celebrate Gov. Byrne’s Pinelands legacy. Byrne used Executive power to force the Legislature to pass the Pinelands Act. Similarly, Gov. Kean used Exetuvie power to force passage of the Freshwater Wetlands Act. And Gov. McGreevey created a Highlands Task Force that was used to forge the Highlands Act.

The climate crisis if far more serious than the solid waste crisis that Florio inherited.

We call  on Gov. Murphy to step up and follow the path of his predecessors.

[Full disclosure: as a disloyal whistleblowing DEP bureaucrat, I was directly involved in the development of the Floio EO #8. Despite being requested to staff the Taskforce effort by the Gov.’s Office, I was blocked from participating by my DEP managers. Regardless, I was insubordinate and provided much of the technical analysis and backup data the Taskforce relied on and that formed future DEP Solid Waste Plan. As they say that all good deeds go unpunished, I receive formal discipline by DEP managers (a 1 week suspension) for that work.]

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Murphy DEP Given Chance To Kill South Jersey Gas Pinelands Pipeline

June 15th, 2018 No comments

First major test of Gov. Murphy’s Climate Leadership

SJG requests DEP permit extensions

Get a competent lawyer and immediately petition DEP to deny the extension request. This must happen before June 23

To avoid expiration, South Jersey Gas (SJG) recently quietly requested that the Murphy DEP extend permits issued for the controversial Pinelands pipeline, which was strongly backed by the Christie administration.

The extensions are requested for a freshwater wetlands “General Permit” (GP) and an individual Waterfront Development permit (IP). The Christie DEP issued these permits in July 2013.

These extension requests are not automatically granted by DEP, but are subject to review. DEP has adequate discretion for denial of the extension requests under DEP rules (e.g. for waterfront development IP extension, see: NJAC 7:7-27.3). DEP denial would force SJG to apply for new permits and begin the permit process all over again, under presumably more aggressive Murphy DEP oversight and purportedly strict climate and energy policies.

After SJG benefitted from green lighting numerous regulatory approvals by the Christie administration, the ball is now in the Murphy DEP’s court.

How DEP handles these SJG requests will be the first major test for Gov. Murphy’s claim to climate leadership. If the Murphy DEP rubber stamps the SJG extension request, they own this project.

Murphy recently signed Legislation (the PSEG nuke bailout bill) that declared a “moral imperative” that the State pursue infrastructure that “does not not produce greenhouse gases“:

Given the overwhelming scientific consensus that fossil-fuel use is causing potentially irreversible global climate change and the attendant environmental catastrophes, it is a moral imperative that the State invest in energy infrastructure within and outside the State that does not produce greenhouse gases. ~~~ Nuke bailout law, P.L. 2018, c.16

The SJG fossil fueled gas pipeline not only “produces” huge quantities of greenhouse gases via methane leaks (methane is a potent GHG: it has 80 – 100 times more warming potential than CO2 in the short run), it also is part of a huge fossil energy infrastructure, which includes re-powering the BL England fossil fueled power plant, which also is a huge emitter off greenhouse gases.

During the original regulatory review of the pipeline by the Board of Public Utilities, DEP, and the Pinelands Commission, SJG made claims that the pipeline was critically needed to avoid catastrophic loss of electric power and gas service to the region. They made claims that the lights would go off and people would freeze in the dark without gas or electric power (i.e. the sham vulnerability and reliability argument). BPU Order summarized as follows:

SJG submits that the Pipeline and repowering of B.L. England are critical to electric reliability of the region. In July 2014, as part of its Regional Transmission Expansion Plan (“RTEP”), PJM studied the effects of a failure to construct the Pipeline and concluded that the resulting shut- down of B.L. England “will have an adverse impact on the reliability of the transmission system.”

To avoid these alleged critical energy infrastructure vulnerabilities –“including the potential for blackouts” (see p. 31)  SJG pressured BPU, DEP and the Pinelands Commission to expedite approvals for the pipeline. BL England made the same arguments about the power plant.

While completely ignoring the science and risks of climate change, the Christie BPU agreed with these SJG scare tactics and concluded (see p. 42)

In this second scenario, during cold weather with an average daily temperature of thirty (30) degrees, 61,058 customers would initially lose gas service, and after the McKee City Liquefied Natural Gas ran out of its supply, a total of 119,820 customers would lose gas service. On days with a lower average daily temperature, approximately 141 ,899 customers would lose gas service. …

The facility is a significant source of base load power generation in Southern New Jersey. B.L. England continued to operate and feed the local power grid supply during Superstorm Sandy in 2012. (@ p. 43)

Amazingly, the Christie DEP press office openly revealed bias in this incredibly unprofessional false statement in support of the SJG scare tactics:

Considine also defended the project on grounds that closing the plant, which sits on Little Egg Harbor in Upper Township, would increase the risk of brownouts in South Jersey. (Philadelphia Inquirer, 8/8/16)

For SJG to now request extension to avoid expiration of DEP permits – after 2 Christie DEP extensions of air pollution compliance deadlines and 5 years of construction delays – exposes the lies they told about the critical and pressing nature of the energy infrastructure vulnerability. 

On that basis alone, DEP should deny the extension requests and force SJG through a new permit review process under the Murphy administration’s “moral imperative” energy infrastructure and climate policy.

But there are additional grounds for DEP to deny the extension requests for failure to comply with DEP regulations.


1) the pipeline and BL England projects have changed;

2) important facts and environmental conditions have changed;

3) DEP regulations have changed. Under DEP permit extension rules, if the rules change, then DEP must DENY the extension request. No wiggle room. They must deny. The wetlands rules have changed regarding: a) GP #2; b) HDD under streams; and c) the definition of water quality certificate changed, a change that effects both the waterfront development and wetlands permit regulations); and,

[CLARIFICATION – rule change is not an automatic basis for denial. The applicant must demonstrate compliance with rule changes. Review and rejection of that demonstration is how the Murphy DEP could reverse Christie DEP regulatory policy.]

4) the original DEP permits were deficient and fatally flawed.

Specifically, neither the applicant SJG nor DEP ever conducted a water quality analysis to demonstrate compliance with NJ surface water quality standards. DEP therefore lacks any factual basis to issue the permit approvals or the water quality certification mandated by law.

Regulatory approvals that lack any factual basis in the administrative record are routinely rejected by courts as “arbitrary and capricious”. Courts do no defer to agency expertise when there is no factual basis in the record to support the agency’s decision.

The SJG extension request now provides the opportunity to re-litigate these issues with the more receptive Murphy DEP.

In addition to the rules governing permit extensions, other DEP regulations specifically include authority to re-open and/or amend or revoke permits if mistakes were made or if material facts were ignored or if material facts have changed.

Pipeline activists must put a full court press on Gov. Murphy and Acting DEP Commissioner McCabe and demand that they deny the SJG extension requests and force SJG back through a de novo permit review process.

DEP has just 15 days – the clock started ticking on June 8, 2018 – to make a decision so advocates must work very quickly and aggressively. Get out a letter to the Gov., issue a press release, and hold an event at the DEP building.

Get a competent lawyer and immediately petition DEP to deny the extension request. This must happen before June 23.

[Update: I just sent this Hail Mary letter requesting legislative oversight:

Dear Chairman Smith:

On June 8, 2018, South Jersey Gas (SJG) requested that DEP extend freshwater wetlands and waterfront development permits issued by the Christie Administration’s DEP to the controversial Pinelands pipeline.

DEP has just 15 days to make a decision under applicable DEP regulations. DEP has adequate authority to deny the SJG request as it does not comply with DEP regulations governing permit extension.

Briefly, the project has changed, material facts have changed, applicable regulations have changed, and the underlying permits were defective for failure to conduct required water quality analysis to demonstrate compliance with NJ surface water quality standards and provide a basis to issue the water quality certification required under DEP’s own regulations.

The Legislature recently found:

“Given the overwhelming scientific consensus that fossil-fuel use is causing potentially irreversible global climate change and the attendant environmental catastrophes, it is a moral imperative that the State invest in energy infrastructure within and outside the State that does not produce greenhouse gases. ~~~ Nuke bailout law, P.L. 2018, c.16

Given this “moral imperative” to avoid investments in fossil infrastructure and the biased regulatory process under which the Christie administration issued DEP, BPU and Pinelands Commission approvals, I urge you to conduct legislative oversight of DEP’s review of the SJG extension request.

Time is of the essence.

I discuss this issue in more detail in the article below.

I appreciate your timely support.


Bill Wolfe

Murphy DEP Given Chance To Kill South Jersey Gas Pinelands Pipeline

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Sixty One On The Shores of Superior

June 14th, 2018 No comments

Year Two On the Road

Lake Superior, just north of Thunder Bay

Lake Superior, just north of Thunder Bay

Old and in the way, that’s what I heard them say
They used to heed the words he said, but that was yesterday
Gold will turn to gray and youth will fade away
They’ll never care about you, call you old and in the way. ~~~ Old and In the Way (listen)

Last year, we turned Sixty on the San Miguel River – 

Last week, we celebrated sixty one on the Shores of Lake Superior in the Canadian woods.

Before setting out for the morning walk, I like to wait 45 minutes or so after sunrise to let the nocturnals find their day dens – Buoy likes to hunt wild critters, and I don’t want him wandering upon a skunk, raccoon, or large predators.

But this morning, we were out at the crack of dawn – just us and the skeeters.

As we turned along the trail, we came upon a very large black bear – Buoy was off immediately after him. Bear took off with amazing speed for something that large. Thank goodness he didn’t catch him!

To get a sense of place, as I enter a region, I typically visit a University campus and book store to get a book on regional landscape, ecology, or history.

In this case, we stopped at University of Michigan at Ann Arbor bookstore and enjoyed Dan Egan’s superb book “The Death and Life of The Great Lakes”. 

Highly recommended – a book that brilliantly defines the region and issues at play in similar ways as such classics as “Cadillac Desert” or “A Sand County Almanac” or “Design With Nature” or  “Silent Spring” or “Our Stolen Future” or “Hazardous Waste In America” or “The Politics of Cancer” or “Expendable Americans” or  “The Machine in the Garden, or even way back to that classic in muckraking “The Jungle“, to name just a few pathbreaking classics that led to activism and policy change. (I am not suggesting that Fagan remotely approaches Upton Sinclair, McHarg, or others, however)

It should be required reading, especially for those interested in “stewardship” or “management” of our natural resources. The chapters on the St. Lawrence Seaway, fisheries, and invasive species are eye opening textbook expose’s of mismanagement, bureaucratic arrogance, technocratic hubris, and economic interests trumping ecosystems.

Some pics:



Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

What Explains NJ Senate Delay In Confirming Murphy’s Acting DEP Commissioner McCabe?

June 5th, 2018 No comments

Senate President Sweeney has yet to release the hostage

Sweeney “squeezes the juice” out of Murphy and McCabe

Is he still holding McCabe hostage in exchange for his wetlands enforcement intervention?

(L-R) Senate President Sweeney; Acting DEP Commissioner McCabe; Assemblyman Burzichelli (Source: YouTube)

(L-R) Senate President Sweeney; Acting DEP Commissioner McCabe; Assemblyman Burzichelli (Source: YouTube)

[Update: 2 days after this post, McCabe was confirmed by the full Senate on June 7, 2018.]

It is June 5 and Acting Commissioner McCabe STILL has not been confirmed by the full NJ Senate.

McCabe testified before and was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee almost a mont ago (May 14).

This is the longest Senate hold on a DEP Commissioner in my 33 year experience with NJ DEP.

It could be the longest ever.

What does Sweeney want? What’s the holdup?

He already got Murphy to sign his PSEG nuke bailout and limit the expansion of renewables.

He already got Murphy to sign his Dupont fracking wastewater OK. Gov. Murphy answered NJ Spotlight’s question with a big wet kiss.

He already got Murphy to sign a cover bill that appears to promote wind, but retains the poison pill “cost test” that authorized BPU to kill wind based on a fatally flawed cost – benefit methodology.

That law derailed a prior bill that would have repealed the OWEDA “cost test” that was the poison pill Sweeney got duped on by Gov. Christie in the Off Shore Wind Act (OWEDA).

Likely due to Sweeney pressure, McCabe’s DEP folded and walked away from assuming control on the long delayed and partial Dupont “cleanup” of their Pompton Lakes site.

Likely due to Sweeney pressure, Murphy did not support calls for a Coastal Commission Sweeney opposed.

Murphy has done nothing at the Pinelands Commission, likely to appease Sweeney who worked with Gov. Christie to corrupt the Commission and ram new gas pipelines and power plants through the regulatory process.

Remarkably, McCabe testified that she was “unfamiliar” with the DEP’s “Category One” (C1) program that Sweeney opposed when DEP originally adopted regulations and Sweeney cut a deal with Christie/Martin to avoid a legislative veto of DEP rules that rolled back C1 buffer protections.

Likely due to Sweeney pressure, Murphy and McCabe folded on stopping the bear hunt.

Murphy appointed Bob Gordon, a moderate former Senate Democrat to the BPU, likely as a result of Sweeney lobbying. Gordon is smart, but he failed to follow through on many things, including BPU implementation of flawed cost – benefit methodology to kill wind.

Sweeney got his former Senate aid, Eric Wacther, installed as McCabe’s Chief of Staff.

Is he still holding McCabe hostage in exchange for his wetlands enforcement intervention?

What else does Sweeney want? He’s already got a LOT of concessions.

Maybe even more concessions, perhaps on an MCL or for Dupont liability for PFOA, PFOS, PFC’s?

Is Sweeney seeking a weak RGGI cap? in RGGI negotiations?

Is Sweeney seeking continuance of NJ law’s RGGI loopholes to protect Big Oil and the carbon polluters in his District?

Approval of the Pinelands and PennEast gas pipelines?

Is Sweeney pressuring Murphy to retain Gov. Christie’s regulatory policy expressed in Christie executive orders that benefit the big polluters in his District?

Does Sweeney want Murphy to help accelerate privatization of public water and sewer systems? (see: 

Sweeney is acting like Gov. Christie’s  – “squeezing the juice” out of a weak DEP Commissioner and a spineless Governor.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Gov. Murphy Can’t Say No To Dupont – Says “Frack You” To The Delaware River & People of Pompton Lakes

June 3rd, 2018 No comments

Dupont Fracking Profits Trump Delaware River

How do NJ Democrats got from banning fracking imports to encouraging them?

DEP Caves On Superfund  – Will Not Assume Control Of Cleanup – Dupont Still In Charge

  • Gov. Murphy explicitly supported importation of toxic waste and creation of a market in toxic waste management. That would result in importation of “more toxic waste in NJ”.
  • Murphy CV reduces “regulatory uncertainty” and explicitly makes it easier for Dupont to secure DEP permit approvals.
  • After misleading the NJ Senate during her confirmation hearing, McCabe is now lying to the press and the public.

Governor Murphy made two horrible decisions this week that show he lacks a spine and can not say no to powerful corporate interests like Dupont, or their puppet, Senate President Sweeney.

Both decisions echo prior decisions made by Gov. Christie. Follow.

I)  Importation and disposal of fracking waste in the Delaware River

The Dupont corporation (now spun off as Chemours) wants to import toxic wastewater from fracking operations in nearby Pennsylvania, treat it, and discharge partially treated wastewater to the Delaware River.

This would threaten the Delaware River because fracking wastewater is a toxic soup of chemical and radioactive contaminants, many of which can not be removed by current treatment technology and would be discharged directly to the Delaware River, threatening ecosystems, fisheries, and public health. In addition, there are risks of spills, leaks, and accidents from truck transportation and handling and storage at Dupont’s Deepwater site.

During the Christie administration, the Democrat controlled legislature – twice – passed bills to ban this practice (see: NJ Democrats Go From Banning Fracking Wastewater to Deregulating and Promoting It).

Governor Christie – twice – vetoed those bills. Taking NJ back to the bad old days, Christie supported Dupont’s efforts to expand a profitable market in waste management and import toxic fracking wastewater.

Remarkably, after Democrats twice previously passed ban bills, under a Democratic Governor, they recently passed a Sweeney sponsored bill – applicable exclusively to Dupont’s Deepwater facility in Sweeney’s district – to encourage Dupont’s scheme and exempt Dupont from DEP permit requirements designed to protect public health and the environment.

It was corrupt special legislation designed to exempt Dupont from strict environmental regulations.

When environmentalists and the press called them out on this BS, Sweeney and other legislators flat out lied and claimed that the bill would not do that. They called the bill purely a “procedural” move.

This week, Gov. Murphy “conditionally vetoed” (CV) the Sweeney bill. If the legislature concurs with the Gov.’s CV, the bill becomes law. The CV says the bill lacks adequate “safeguards”, and contradicts Sweeney’s “procedural” assertions.

The CV is being badly mis-reported in the press, see: Phil Murphy refuses to sign DuPont spinoff co.’s bill to allow more toxic waste into NJ.

The press is creating two totally false impressions that: 1) Gov. Murphy opposes importation and expansion of toxic waste in NJ; and 2) the “safeguards” and requirements of the CV will block Dupont’s plans.

The exact opposite is true:

1. In his CV, Gov. Murphy explicitly supports the importation of toxic waste and creation of a market in toxic waste management. That would result in importation of “more toxic waste in NJ”.

Gov. Murphy wrote:

While I certainly support the intent of the bill’s sponsors to simplify the process of siting facilities that until recently were authorized to operate as commercial facilities and conduct commercial hazardous waste operations, I am concerned that the bill does not contain specific safeguards to protect the health of our environment and the safety of our residents.

First of all, the sponsors did not seek to “simplify the process”, they sought to exempt Dupont from the DEP permit process.

Secondly, Murphy explicitly supports the “conduct of commercial hazardous waste operations”.

By definition, that means importation of more toxic waste into NJ and discharging it to the Delaware River – exactly the opposite of what the press is reporting.

The Gov.’s CV also locks in and approves Dupont’s existing treatment capacity – a huge amount that they have not used in years:

may resume commercial hazardous waste operations at the capacity which existed at the time the facility had stopped accepting hazardous waste generated off-site, but the baseline capacity established pursuant to P.L.1981, c.279 (C.13:1E-49, et seq.) shall remain unchanged

Dupont would have a very tough time justifying that much capacity – so the CV not only gives a favorable regulatory incentive to Dupont and allows Dupont to accept a LOT of fracking wastewater, it locks in a valuable asset and marketable commodity (which they may have already sold to Chemours).

2. The press also reports that the “safeguards” in Murphy’s CV will block Dupont’s plan.

That is flat out false as well.

In fact, the CV reduces “regulatory uncertainty” and explicitly makes it easier for Dupont to secure DEP permit approvals.

Specifically, there are two kinds of DEP approvals involved: a) a relatively easy to receive “permit modification” of an existing permit; and b) a far more rigorous and difficult to obtain “new permit”.

The legal and technical burdens are far lower for a permit modification than a new permit. Take my word for it, a full explanation is beyond the scope of this note (or Google the DEP NJPDES and RCRA permit regulations and find out for yourself)

The CV would allow Dupont to secure a “permit modification” from the DEP, and do so under existing rules.

The reliance on existing rules basically blocks DEP from adopting new regulations to close huge loopholes in existing permit rules that apply to fracking wastewater. It also makes it harder for DEP to deny any Dupont application because the law requires that permits be reviewed under the rules in effect at the time the application is submitted.

Here is the applicable text Murphy wrote:

provided that, prior to commencing such operations, it applies for and obtains necessary modifications to its existing operating permit or permits or a new operating permit or permits, as may be applicable, which shall require compliance with current regulatory standards issued or adopted by the department.

Gov. Murphy could have: 1) declared a moratorium in fracking treatment and discharge permits, 2) mandated that DEP adopt new rules to close loopholes in current rules; and 3) that Dupont secure a new permit under new more protective rules.

But he didn’t do any of that. He did the opposite on all 3 policies.

So, the fine print directly contradicts the Gov. spin, as reported in the press.

Of course, if he really wanted to block the Dupont fracking plan, he could have simply straight up vetoed the bill.

And Sweeney is lying again too: (Record)

But at a news conference Thursday, Sweeney said he was fine with the changes suggested by Murphy. “We want the same things, and if you want a belt and suspenders, you know, that was our goal from the beginning,” he said. …

Business groups and some local officials said the bill was simply a procedural move that will allow wastewater to be properly treated while benefiting the Salem County area.

While misreporting the effect of Gov. Murphy’s CV, the Record did get something important right, that explains a lot of what is going on here:

Like many companies, DuPont and Chemours have tried to influence regulators and lawmakers for decades, employing as many as three lobbying firms in one year. 

The companies paid more than $1.1 million to lobby New Jersey officials from 2011 through 2016, records show. Their interests have also been advocated by the powerful New Jersey Chemistry Council, a lobbying group that represents dozens of companies regulated by the DEP and the federal Environmental Protection Agency.

II)   After Murphy Alludes to Love Canal, Acting DEP Commissioner McCabe folds on Dupont Pompton Lakes Cleanup

 After Gov. Murphy compared the Dupont Pompton Lakes site to the infamous Love Canal, residents renewed their push to have the site managed under the federal Superfund program and Murphy directed DEP Acting Commissioner McCabe to conduct a review of the situation and submit recommendations to him.

But the press failed to report that residents also asked the Murphy DEP to revoke the 1988 Administrative Consent Order (ACO) that allows Dupont to control the cleanup process and instead assume complete DEP control of the cleanup.  (Press should contact Lisa Riggiola of CCPL for a copy of that letter to Murphy & McCabe. Or I’d be glad to forward an email copy.)

Regardless, McCabe just folded on both demands.

The Record reported today: Like Christie, Murphy’s DEP says no to Superfund for Pompton Lakes cleanup

Gov. Phil Murphy’s administration has no plans to seek Superfund status to speed cleanup of a contaminated plume and former DuPont munitions site in Pompton Lakes, despite pleas for such action from many residents who must live with the cancer-causing pollution.

“I don’t see any advantage in Superfund,” Catherine McCabe, acting commissioner of the state Department of Environmental Protection, said last week in an interview with The Record and

More of the “continuity” and lies we’ve be writing about. And I hate to say it, but we told you this was coming months ago (see: Played In Pompton Lakes)

[A friend just noted that McCabe made her decision without meeting with or talking to the People of Pompton Lakes – a big contrast to her outreach and “listening session” during the “Sweeney Tour”.]

To their credit, the Record reported that McCabe’s claims of “no advantage in Superfund” were flat out contradicted by McCabe’s former agency, US EPA:

Superfund status would provide a more ironclad cleanup plan for Pompton Lakes that could not be as easily challenged by Chemours, according to U.S. Environmental Protection emails obtained by The Record and

It would also give residents more opportunity to have their concerns heard. And it would allow them to hire independent contractors to examine mounds of scientific data.

But that’s not all.

McCabe directly contradicted her prior boss at EPA, EPA Regional Administrator Judith Enck, who said:

Six years ago, a leading EPA official told McCabe’s predecessor, then-DEP commissioner Bob Martin, how Pompton Lakes would benefit from Superfund.

Judith Enck, a former EPA regional administrator, pushed Martin and the Christie administration in 2012 to put Pompton Lakes into the Superfund program.

States must nominate toxic sites to begin the Superfund process, and Enck said the Christie administration was the biggest obstacle.

“I think the new administration should consider sending a letter to EPA for Superfund designation,” Enck has told The Record, referring to the new Murphy administration.

After misleading the NJ Senate during her confirmation hearing, McCabe is now lying to the press and the public.

McCabe also completely obfuscated the issue on groundwater cleanup. McCabe said:

“It looks to me based on the scientific information we have that the plume is being cleaned up,” McCabe said. “As with any natural process this takes time, but the people living above the plume are protected by the vapor mitigation systems on their homes.” …

“The plume does seem to be attenuating,” McCabe said. “It seems to be working. But we’re always looking at ways that would speed up the cleanup process.”

First of all, a toxic groundwater “cleanup” is not a “natural process”.

Second, McCabe was referring to “natural attenuation”, a “passive remedy” that is basically a policy that waives compliance with groundwater standards and allows polluters off the hook for more costly and aggressive “active ” cleanup and “permanent remedy” like full contaminated source soil excavation and “pump and treat”.

These are regulatory policy decisions made by DEP that McCabe is dodging responsibility for and obfuscating as “science”.  Shame on her.

Dupont previously was required to install a groundwater pump and treat system, but was allowed to turn if off in favor of a cheaper “passive remedy” “natural attenuation” – dilution approach. They also have not removed all contaminated soils and sediments.

Residents and media need to ask DEP and EPA exactly WHEN the “natural attenuation” process will achieve compliance with NJ groundwater standards. 50 years? 100 years?

Dilution is not the solution to pollution.

Some “New era in environmental protection”.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: