Archive

Archive for March, 2012

Dancin’ Up A River in the Dark

March 13th, 2012 No comments

river

Court and Spark (Joni Mitchell – (1974) Listen)

Love came to my door
With a sleeping roll
And a madman’s soul
He thought for sure I’d seen him
Dancing up a river in the dark
Looking for a woman
To court and spark

He was playing on the sidewalk
For passing change
When something strange happened
Glory train passed through him
So he buried the coins he made
In People’s Park
And went looking for a woman
To court and spark

 

It seemed like he read my mind
He saw me mistrusting him
And still acting kind
He saw how I worried sometimes
I worry sometimes

“All the guilty people” he said
They’ve all seen the stain
On their daily bread
On their christian names
I cleared myself
I sacrificed my blues
And you could complete me
I’d complete you

 

His eyes were the color of the sand
And the sea
And the more he talked to me
The more he reached me
But I couldn’t let go of L.A.
City of the fallen angels

hudson

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Will NJ Forests Bend Over for Biomass?

March 13th, 2012 4 comments

Tom Johnson over at NJ Spotlight has an interesting story today about an Assembly bill sponsored by Assemblyman Chivukula that would expand the definition of renewable energy (see: Assembly Committee Redefines Renewable Energy – Bill would extend ratepayer subsidies to some technologies based on fossil fuels

While some enviro lobbyists saw threats from fossil and garbage fuels, it occurred to me that the issue of biomass subsidies was equally of concern.

That concern is greatly magnified when one connects a few dots.

Maybe Chivukula is talking to Senator Bob Smith on “biomass” and “sustainable forestry”? Maybe the same lobbyists are talking to both legislators and drafting amendments?

Is it pure coincidence that Smith’s “forest harvest “, oops, I meant “forest stewardship” initiative promotes biomass fuels?

The introduced version of that  bill S1085 sought to:

to create an economic market for forest products; that such products may serve as renewable biomass, which may be used to produce energy; and that such renewable sources of energy could reduce the use of coal and other fossil fuels, thereby reducing carbon emissions.

Very similar language and policy is found in Chivukula’s bill, A1383, which would expand the definition of Class I renewable energy to include:

“biomass facility, provided that the biomass is cultivated and harvested in a sustainable manner, or is used for energy production in a facility that meets this State’s air permitting requirements and uses wood, wood-derived fuel or other materials separated from the waste stream as its primary fuel.”

Sometimes it helps to actually read the bills.

A little skepticism goes a long way.

Something to watch for and clarify at Smith’s April 26 “Stakeholder meeting”.

Both bills should be opposed and for similar reasons.

[Update – I am putting Alan Muller’s comment in the text, as it has a link to good info and most readers would not see comment section. Alan wrote:

NJ forestry interests and others have been promoting this stuff for years. It’s really bad high carbon emissions, high health-damaging emissions, the obvious consequences of massive clearcutting. One good source: http://www.pfpi.net/

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

A Bankruptcy of Stewardship

March 13th, 2012 No comments

A Challenge to Governor Christie and the Legislature

Today, we do another Guest Post, by retired DEP professional William Honachefsky, P.L.S., P.P., QEP.

Bill has seen it all – his experience goes back over 50 years, starting in 1961 with DEP’s predecessor, the Department of Conservation and Economic Development. Bill was there at DEP’s inception and has worked in land use and water resources planning, permitting and enforcement programs.

We invite and welcome submissions by retired and active agency professionals, and of course will maintain confidentiality and allow writers to post anonymously. If interested in a Guest post, you can send it to me at Bill_Wolfe (at) comcast (dot) net.

By William Honachefsky, P.L.S., P.P., QEP

shThe intensity at which the State’s legislators and Governor’s office seem driven to destroy (See especially Senate Bill S3156 and Assembly Bill A4335 [Ed. Note: the WQMP bill has since been signed into law]) or at the least emasculate, 41 years of the State’s hard won environmental protection laws, rules and regulations is not only unsettling, it’s mind boggling, and quite frankly one has to wonder if the state legislature and the executive branches of government have completely lost their minds.

In 1987 Gordon Bishop, one of the state’s respected environmental journalists at the time, opined that;

New Jersey is conspicuously perched at the tip of the population needle. More people, cars, buildings, roads, pipes and wires are crammed per square mile within this confined space than in any state in the nation. Wherever America is going in the 21st century, New Jersey will get there first on those indices that define the quality of life.

Other states, and even some nations, much less densely populated, have looked to New Jersey for a glimpse of their own future. If Mr. Bishop’s prediction, that as New Jersey goes, so goes the Nation, proves accurate, then we all have significant reason to be alarmed over our future quality of life, especially given these latest, legislative initiatives designed, perhaps unwittingly, to unravel an already tattered and stressed life supporting ecological infrastructure combined as an intricate web of air, soil, water and geology.

During 37 of those 41 years of promulgation of the State’s environmentally protective legislation and consequent rules and regulations I worked for the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, serving under everyone of the DEP’s Commissioners appointed since the DEP’s inception, including the current Mr. Martin, and 30-40 Deputy and Assistant Commissioners. Prior to that, in 1961 through 1963, I had the privilege of working for the NJDEP’s predecessor, the Department of Conservation and Economic Development, helping construct Spruce Run Reservoir.

In those later three and one half decades of employment with NJDEP, I participated in various permitting, planning, enforcement, emergency response, inspection, and monitoring and assessment programs. In this same time period I collected and analyzed thousands of soil, sediment, water, air, sewage treatment plant, and industrial waste samples from throughout the State. The latter industrial waste samples often collected at sites later to become some of the state’s most toxic superfund sites.

Having had such an intimate, prolonged, and unique immersion in the development and operation of the NJDEP’s mandated environmental protection programs it is clear that both legislative and executive branch sponsors really do not understand the full consequences of the dar  journey they are about to undertake, especially if bills S3156 and A4335 are passed and the Governor’s Executive Orders and disruptive political appointments to the Highlands Council continue unchallenged.

Make no mistake about it, the battered condition of the State’s ecological infrastructure that existed on Earth Day in 1970 has improved, but not so significantly that we can now relax our rules and regulations even for a moment. We learned the hard way for example;

1) that disposing of our toxic industrial wastes by dumping them onto and into the ground and landfills would eventually bring those toxic materials into our drinking water wells and into our homes, and which, in some instances, still defy remediation;

2) that despite limitations set forth in NJPDES municipal and industrial waste discharge permits to the state’s waterways, we had forgotten to simultaneously evaluate the assimilative capacity of those receiving waterways and the impacts on the organisms (fish, benthic macroinvertebrates and amphibians) that call those waterways home. That has been remedied by the establishment of extensive ambient chemical monitoring, lake monitoring, fish monitoring and benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring networks throughout the State;

3) that some permittees will covertly cheat on their permit limits, or more often learn how to defeat those limits by manipulating their flows or processes, both of which would go undetected without consistent inspections and sampling by NJDEP enforcement staff an undertaking becoming more difficult as DEP staff continues to be cut;

4) that the expansion of human development and the prodigious amounts of impervious cover it produces (i.e. roadways, sidewalks, rooftops, parking areas and lawns)once overlain on the land, will eventually slough off a cocktail of toxic chemicals, excessive nutrients, dangerous bacteria and recently identified chemical compounds such as prescribed medicines, illegal drugs, and personal care products;

5) that our great experiment with stormwater control structures to reduce contaminants in runoff and reduce the total volume of runoff has promised more than it can or has delivered, and we therefore need to seriously take a step back and re-examine our effort in this regard before we go off promoting more and more land development. If you remain unconvinced in this regard, talk to those living near the Passaic, Pompton and Raritan Rivers;

6) that a piecemeal, case by case approval of new sanitary sewer connections or extensions can severely disrupt and potentially truncate the long range goals embodied in municipal Master Plans and at the same time expand an existing inventory of aging sanitary sewerlines already in dire need of a repair or replacement, so exorbitant, that it could lead to the State’s bankruptcy;

7) that promoting development in pristine, upland watersheds will eventually result in the accumulation, transportation and delivery of water to downstream users, particularly potable water purveyors, laced with contaminants which cannot be removed without substantial added expense, thereby driving up costs to the user, and finally;

8 ) that environmentally protective laws, rules and regulations did not cause the current economical malaise, and will not in any way, shape or form cure it.

Much of the NJDEP’s time was also spent trying to restore portions of the State’s ecological infrastructure that had been terribly abused for over a 100 years or more by our unwitting predecessors, particularly in the Northeast and Southwest regions of the State. That effort has been difficult, exhausting and, quite frankly, in many instances remains undoable.

Make no mistake DEP staff have learned these lessons and many more, often despite policies, imposed upon them by revolving door Commissioners bearing political agendas that are often counterintuitive to the fundamentals of environmental protection.

I therefore wish to make the following proposals and challenges to the sponsors of Bills S3156 and A4335 and other legislators, and the Governor as well:

a) Meet me on any stream of your choice, in your respective jurisdictions, and I will show you firsthand the damage that is continuing to occur on the State’s waterways and which will worsen as a consequence of the proposals set forth in your respective Bills. It is the dirty little secret kept hidden in sequestered Stressor Identification studies completed by NJDEP’s Water Monitoring and Standards Element 2 years ago. I challenge you to try to pry those studies free from NJDEP, something the public has been unable to do.

b) Delay the vote on or withdraw Bills S3156 and A4335 until you have perused the data assessments of the status of stream water quality, lake water quality, fish life and stream insects throughout the State, to be found on the NJDEP’s Water Monitoring and Assessment Element’s website. You may be surprised to find that streams within your district are at a critical tipping point and highly susceptible to the coup de grace which will surely be delivered by your proposed Bills.

I find it fitting to close with the following relevant quote from Stuart Udall’s 1963 book the “Quiet Crisis”:

The economic bankruptcy that gnawed at our country’s vitals after 1929 was closely related to a bankruptcy of land stewardship. The buzzards of the raiders had, at last, come back to roost, and for each bank failure, there were land failures by the hundreds. In a sense the Great Depression, was a bill collector sent by nature, and the dark tidings were borne on every silt laden stream and every dust cloud that darkened the horizon.”

Now is the time to prove to your constituents, other than special interests, and especially our children and those to follow, that yes, while we were in charge, we were good stewards of the land, and not its enemy.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Walking In Memphis

March 12th, 2012 1 comment

mem1

[Update: Joni Mitchell has a different – richer – take on Beale Street: listen to Furry Sings the Blues (1976)

Walking in Memphis (Marc Cohn (1991) listen)

Put on my blue suede shoes
And I boarded the plane
Touched down in the land of the Delta Blues
In the middle of the pouring rain
W.C. Handy, won’t you look down over me
Yeah I got a first class ticket
But I’m as blue as a boy can be

[Chorus]
Then I’m walking in Memphis
Walking with my feet ten feet off of Beale
Walking in Memphis
But do I really feel the way I feel …

mem2

mem4

mem5

mem6

mem7

mem8

the other side of Memphis

the other side of Memphis

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

“Dirty Dirt” is Dangerous – and Ignored

March 11th, 2012 1 comment

DEP Ignores Waste Regulations – Falsely Claims “Buyers Beware”

It’s very much buyer beware,” said Larry Ragonese, a DEP spokesman.

~~~ Bergen Record (March 11, 2012)

[Important Updates below]

dirtI’ve often written about loopholes in DEP regulations and the environmental and health risks posed by lack of effective State and local oversight of contaminated soils, AKA “Dirty Dirt” (h/t Jeff Tittel for coining that phrase).

In addition to soils, DEP has lax oversight of a whole range of dangerous and frequently toxic and high volume wastes – from construction/demolition debris, to dredge spoils and other industrial residuals, like coal and incinerators ash (e.g. see  this July 28, 2008 post about a criminal conviction for contaminated soil disposal: Jail Time for Dirty Dirt – Who’s Next?  [also see:Recapping a Fiascomy Bergen Record Op-Ed of May 25, 2008 about illegal contaminated soil imports to Encap, see also:

The lack of oversight results in toxic materials being commingled with products sold and widely distributed in commerce, from “clean top soil”, to compost, home insulation, and fertilizers (see this for more examples in other states nationally).

People are unknowingly and needlessly exposed to toxics, and local taxpayers often pick up the costly cleanup tab.

As I said in a February 8, 2012 Bergen Record story on soil contamination that closed Votee Park in Teaneck:

“This stuff happens again and again and again, and nobody is connecting the underlying dots,” Wolfe said. “Are there laws in place to do this, and who is responsible for enforcing them? The answer is there are laws in place, but the government is completely asleep at the wheel. And the towns are left holding the bag.”

It’s a complex story, so of course few depleted main stream outlets or reporters will spend the mental energy and time investigating it.

Yet, highly visible problems and costly controversies regularly erupt from the resulting contamination. The stories and problems caused by lax oversight are legion and statewide: from Encap, to toxic soil from a Ford Edison plant cleanup used at 19 residential construction sites in central NJ, to pesticide contaminated soils at schools and School Construction Corp. sites, and to the importation of contaminated soil that cost taxpayers $25 million at Trenton’s Martin Luther King School construction fiasco.

As I testified to the Legislature way back in June 2006, risks from dirty dirt included lax oversight of the cleanup process (e.g. contaminated soils are laundered and commingled and sold as clean fill). Reforms I suggested, included::

  • Impose cradle-to-grave management requirements for contaminated soils and demolition waste;

  • Prohibit any “beneficial reuse” of contaminated materials in residential areas;
  • Establish a DEP and local health officer monitoring presence on scene during active critical stages of the cleanup process;

So , in response to a recent legislative hearing on reforms and the Record’s coverage of the Votee Park problem, I emailed Record reporter Denisa Superville.

And in a recent post, I laid it all out on a platter for some  intrepid journalist to run with. I wrote:

for those that like to get down in the weeds, here are some regulatory rocks to turn over at DEP, to wake the sleeping giant:

Unfortunately, the “intrepid journalist” that was assigned (or stole) the followup story was Scott Fallon, a reporter who regularly lets DEP blow smoke up his ass.

For example, here’s a real serious and basic fact error he made in his story today.

The effect of this error is to allow DEP and polluters to dodge accountability. Read this closely and see how. Fallon wrote:

Contaminated fill “often a mixture of soil and construction debris” brought in decades ago to help level the fields at Votee and Veterans is the likely culprit. Yet there are no safeguards to prevent similar contamination from happening elsewhere. Those who oversee parks are on their own when it comes to ensuring that the soil they use is safe, says the state Department of Environmental Protection.

“It’s very much buyer beware,” said Larry Ragonese, a DEP spokesman.

Fill comes from a variety of sources, from soil excavated for building projects to pulverized concrete from demolition debris. While concrete is required to be tested at demolition sites before it can be recycled, no such DEP regulations exist for soil.

That is just completely factually false.

So let me break it down for Mr. Fallon and his readers:

  • There are DEP regulations that apply;
  • There is a DEP waste classification and regulatory program “to prevent similar contamination from happening elsewhere”;
  • construction and demolition waste is regulated by DEP
  • contaminated soil is regulated by DEP
  • it is the waste generator’s legal responsibility to classify his waste

To save Fallon the effort of hitting the link, here is a relevant excerpt from one DEP program that proves DEP press office and Fallon’a reporting are factually in error:

Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Program – Guidance Document For Waste Classification

Waste classification is a service provided to the public by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s (the Department) Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Program, Bureau of Landfill and Hazardous Waste Permitting (Bureau). The Bureau’s waste classification process functions as support for industry, business, government, and individuals that generate waste and need assistance in determining whether a waste is non-hazardous or hazardous as defined in the New Jersey hazardous waste regulations at N.J.A.C. 7:26G-1, 3-12 et seq. These regulations state that it is the responsibility of the waste generator to determine whether the waste generated is hazardous in accordance with the definition stated in N.J.A.C. 7:26G-5.1 et seq.

TYPES OF WASTE CLASSIFIED

Examples of some types of waste classified include the following:

  1. Soil contaminated with virgin petroleum fuel only.
  2. Soil contaminated with waste oil.
  3. Soil contaminated with process waste.
  4. Soil contaminated with virgin chemicals.
  5. Soil, N.O.S.*
  6. Spill cleanup waste (non-soil).
  7. Ash from fossil fuel combustion.
  8. Ash from waste incineration.
  9. Dredge spoils.
  10. Sewage sludge.
  11. Process waste sludge.
  12. Sludge, N.O.S.*
  13. Waste oil.
  14. Grit and screenings.
  15. Contaminated water.
  16. Municipal waste.
  17. Empty containers.
  18. Household exempt waste.
  19. Construction/ demo debris.
  20. Product/ raw materials.
  21. Process waste, N.O.S.* Not Otherwise Specified

PROCEDURES FOR OBTAINING REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES OF WASTE – end excerpt

It’s no secret that Fallon does not like me – he phoned me not so long ago to scream at me for  criticizing his “derivative” and “he said/she said” and crappy failed accountability brand of journalism (he must like the DEP press office smoke up his ass).

Fallon would prefer to get the story wrong and mislead his readers, rather than call me and get it right. That is unprofessional.

Worse, Fallon pulls this shit despite the fact that I was the quoted source in the Votee Park story that set up story that he is specifically rebutting with his false and misleading coverage (see above failure to “connect the dots” quote).

This is despite my expertise, and despite the fact that I laid out the applicable DEP regulations on a silver platter for him (which he obviously didn’t read, or he would not have gotten smoke blown up his ass by DEP).

And on top of all that, Fallon ignored directly relevant the pending legislation – S1355 sponsored by Bergen County Senator  Robert Gordon no less – that would address some of the loopholes.

The Gordon bill would require plans, specification, and bid proposal documents for certain local public contracts too address soil contamination.

The bill was released by the Senate Environmental Committee just days ago, on February 27, 2012.

Yet the Record didn’t even cover the legislation and Fallon ignored it too, while giving DEP a pass.

*Pathetic.

[* Instead of enforcing regulations, DEP ignores them.

Instead of the press holding DEP accountable for irresponsible lack of oversight and enforcement, they provide excuses for doing nothing.

[Update #1: And DEP is not the only problem – county and local governments are looking the other way as well. In that Feb 8 Record article, I also said this:

Bill Wolfe, the director of the state Chapter of the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, said towns are not likely to test the soil at their public parks without being required to.

“A town can say voluntarily, to be precautionary, we are going to go out and look and sample the parks and public spaces, that we want to protect our residents because we care,” he said.

“There is not a town in the state that’s doing that, because it costs money,” he added. “It’s as simple as that. If they don’t have to do it, they won’t do it. You literally have to make them do it, and that, to me, is unfortunate.”

[Update #2 – 9/3/12 – Bergen Record column by Mike Kelley lays out the story: Tainted soil is everywhere, but where did it all com from?

Whatever the reason for the contamination, some environmentalists are calling for upgraded monitoring to stop future dumping. One proposal calls for random testing of soil-laden dump trucks cruising New Jersey’s roads.

“It’s like drug testing of athletes,” said Bill Wolfe, the New Jersey representative for Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, a national group of former government environmental officials. “If dumpers know they might get caught and know the penalty is high, they won’t do it.”

Ooops, I forgot – the Christie DEP doesn’t do enforcement anymore.

 

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: