Home > Uncategorized > Gov. Christie Killed Ecological Cleanup Standards At Heart Of Exxon Deal

Gov. Christie Killed Ecological Cleanup Standards At Heart Of Exxon Deal

Ecological Standards Are Far Stricter Than Human Health Standards

[Update below provides example]

Back in 2010, Governor Christie quietly signed legislation – portrayed at the time as eliminating defunct government advisory boards – but that also eliminated DEP’s legislative authority to adopt ecologically based cleanup standards in NJ’s toxic site cleanup program (scroll to page 3 to see the new section 35.a language, which deleted the ecological standards and link to recommendations of the Environmental Advisory Task Force – see below for the specific original language that was deleted by this law. If you want the actual fingerprints, you have to go back and read the bill, A2851 [1R] the Gov. signed – look who sponsored it! Mr. Red Tape himself, Burzichelli, (D-Oil))

That one stealth move by Gov. Christie reduced the cleanup liability of polluters at hundreds of sites in NJ by billions of dollars and assured that NJ’s natural resources would not be protected from toxic sites. Here’s how.

Previously, we explained the huge difference between the extent and cost of a site cleanup to meet ecologically based standards for “restoration” of natural resources under DEP’s Natural Resource Damage (NRD) program (i.e. “permanent remedy” excavation of contamination to original conditions), versus the far lower cost of a “remediation” under DEP’s Site Remediation program (i.e. “engineering controls” to merely cap contamination on site).

The Exxon deal shines a very bright light on that distinction, but it also shows how ecologically based cleanups are far stricter, better,  and more costly than cleanups based on protection of human health.

The Exxon economic analysis highlights that critical point (on page 8):

ecological

The DEP’s ability to compel ecologically based cleanups has long been a controversial issue in NJ. Polluters have strongly opposed DEP’s efforts to base cleanups on far more costly ecological protections that require far more complete cleanups.

In 1993, the legislature sided with the polluters and passed a law that said that DEP could not adopt ecologically based cleanup standards until an expert Environmental Advisory Task Force (EATF)  met and provided scientific recommendations (see: Section 35 .a. of P.L.1993, c.139 (C.58:10B-12):

The department shall not propose or adopt remediation standards protective of the environment pursuant to this section, except standards for groundwater or surface water, until recommendations are made by the Environment Advisory Task Force created pursuant to section 37 of P.L.1993, c.139. Until the Environment Advisory Task Force issues its recommendations and the department adopts remediation standards protective of the environment as required by this section, the department shall continue to determine the need for and the application of remediation standards protective of the environment on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the guidance and regulations of the United States Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to the “Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980,” 42 U.S.C. s.9601 et seq. and other statutory authorities as applicable.

Members of the EATF were supposed to be appointed by the Governor.

The polluters used their political muscle to block those appointments. As a result, there were no appointments and the EATF never met and never made recommendations to DEP pursuant to Section 35.a.

As a result, the DEP never adopted State ecological standards and therefore could not force polluters to cleanup toxic sites to protect natural resources. There was a defacto moratorium that held ecological standards in limbo for many years.

We confronted this lack of DEP ecological cleanup standard in out battle with Dupont in Pompton Lakes – here’s how Dupont themselves note this lack of DEP standards:

NJDEP has promulgated soil remediation standards for residential and nonresidential exposure. However, no promulgated soil standards are available for ecological receptors.

NJDEP does not have any promulgated sediment criteria for evaluating potential human exposure or for ecological receptors. For ecological receptors, NJDEP’s 1998 sediment guidance is available to evaluate sediment quality within Baseline Ecological Evaluations as part of implementing the Technical Requirements (N.J.A.C. 7:26E). However, in accordance with the sediment guidance (NJDEP, 1998), these values are not cleanup standards.

Lack of ecological standards severely weakens DEP’s hand in negotiating with polluters on cleanups, because – as Dupont clearly notes – the Guidance values are not standards and are thus not legally enforceable.

Then, 17 years later, Gov. Christie used the failure of the EATF to be formed, meet, and make recommendations to DEP as an excuse to kill it as a defunct advisory board.

The law that Christie signed in 2010 abolished the EATF.

And in the law killing the EATF, Christie also stripped the above cited Section 35.a. provisions from NJ’s cleanup laws that give DEP the legal authority to develop ecologically based cleanup standards, thereby prevention any future Governor or DEP Commissioner from strengthening NJ’s cleanup program.

That move permanently  absolved NJ’s corporate polluters from the costly cleanups we are now seeing exposed by the Exxon $8.9 billion deal.

Specifically, a $1.53 billion cost component of the DEP’s Exxon on-site natural resource restoration plan was for excavation and off-site disposal of 9 million tons of contaminated sludge, soils, and sediments to meet ecological protection standards.

DEP could not compel such a costly excavation under DEP’s site remediation program, which lacks ecological cleanup standards.

So, long before Gov. Christie cut the dirty deal with Exxon, he gutted NJ’s cleanup laws to prevent DEP from ever adopting the kind of ecological cleanup standards that would have cost Exxon $1.53 billion at just one site.

[Update – as an illustration of how controversial ecological standard is:

In 2002, DEP Commissioner Campbell attempted an end run around the legal bar in remediation law to cleanup standards. DEP relied on its Clean Water Act authority and proposed ecologically based surface water quality standards known as “wildlife criteria” for toxics PCB, DDT, and mercury.

The polluters waged a strong political campaign opposing that proposal, met secretly with Campbell  – see letter to DEP by the Chemistry Council – which forced DEP to withdraw that proposal.]

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:
  1. No comments yet.
Comment pages
1 2 3 4 39737
  1. May 5th, 2015 at 23:39 | #1
  2. May 17th, 2015 at 22:05 | #2
  3. May 18th, 2015 at 13:01 | #3
  4. May 19th, 2015 at 09:02 | #4
  5. May 27th, 2015 at 13:53 | #5
  6. May 28th, 2015 at 06:32 | #6
  7. May 28th, 2015 at 06:35 | #7
  8. May 28th, 2015 at 07:19 | #8
  9. May 28th, 2015 at 07:31 | #9
  10. May 28th, 2015 at 15:52 | #10
  11. May 29th, 2015 at 06:26 | #11
  12. May 29th, 2015 at 18:27 | #12
  13. May 29th, 2015 at 21:53 | #13
  14. May 30th, 2015 at 05:07 | #14
  15. May 31st, 2015 at 07:27 | #15
  16. May 31st, 2015 at 09:01 | #16
  17. May 31st, 2015 at 10:48 | #17
  18. June 1st, 2015 at 09:56 | #18
  19. June 1st, 2015 at 12:20 | #19
  20. June 1st, 2015 at 13:45 | #20
  21. June 1st, 2015 at 16:38 | #21
  22. June 1st, 2015 at 17:01 | #22
  23. June 1st, 2015 at 19:24 | #23
  24. June 2nd, 2015 at 01:23 | #24
  25. June 2nd, 2015 at 19:46 | #25
  26. June 2nd, 2015 at 19:48 | #26
  27. June 3rd, 2015 at 12:57 | #27
  28. June 5th, 2015 at 05:48 | #28
  29. June 5th, 2015 at 17:27 | #29
  30. June 5th, 2015 at 19:49 | #30
  31. June 6th, 2015 at 06:01 | #31
  32. June 6th, 2015 at 15:30 | #32
  33. June 6th, 2015 at 17:41 | #33
  34. June 7th, 2015 at 15:06 | #34
  35. June 9th, 2015 at 09:46 | #35
  36. June 9th, 2015 at 19:47 | #36
  37. June 9th, 2015 at 20:11 | #37
  38. June 10th, 2015 at 11:25 | #38
  39. June 13th, 2015 at 04:01 | #39
  40. June 14th, 2015 at 17:24 | #40
  41. June 14th, 2015 at 20:59 | #41
  42. June 15th, 2015 at 09:17 | #42
  43. June 15th, 2015 at 13:16 | #43
  44. June 16th, 2015 at 01:32 | #44
  45. June 16th, 2015 at 19:52 | #45
  46. June 17th, 2015 at 05:40 | #46
  47. June 17th, 2015 at 09:29 | #47
  48. June 17th, 2015 at 18:03 | #48
  49. June 18th, 2015 at 07:46 | #49
  50. June 18th, 2015 at 21:37 | #50
  51. June 19th, 2015 at 10:20 | #51
  52. June 19th, 2015 at 10:40 | #52
  53. June 19th, 2015 at 15:04 | #53
  54. June 19th, 2015 at 19:15 | #54
  55. June 20th, 2015 at 05:12 | #55
  56. June 20th, 2015 at 11:17 | #56
  57. June 20th, 2015 at 14:55 | #57
  58. June 20th, 2015 at 16:13 | #58
  59. June 20th, 2015 at 20:25 | #59
  60. June 21st, 2015 at 11:14 | #60
  61. June 21st, 2015 at 13:14 | #61
  62. June 21st, 2015 at 15:15 | #62
  63. June 22nd, 2015 at 13:55 | #63
  64. June 23rd, 2015 at 00:42 | #64
  65. June 23rd, 2015 at 10:23 | #65
  66. June 24th, 2015 at 04:15 | #66
  67. June 24th, 2015 at 16:45 | #67
  68. June 24th, 2015 at 20:58 | #68
  69. June 25th, 2015 at 05:14 | #69
  70. June 25th, 2015 at 05:20 | #70
  71. June 25th, 2015 at 13:12 | #71
  72. June 25th, 2015 at 13:47 | #72
  73. June 25th, 2015 at 14:21 | #73
  74. June 25th, 2015 at 17:47 | #74
  75. June 25th, 2015 at 22:10 | #75
  76. June 25th, 2015 at 22:16 | #76
  77. June 26th, 2015 at 00:19 | #77
  78. June 26th, 2015 at 02:28 | #78
  79. June 26th, 2015 at 10:59 | #79
  80. June 26th, 2015 at 11:35 | #80
  81. June 26th, 2015 at 15:29 | #81
  82. June 26th, 2015 at 16:50 | #82
  83. June 26th, 2015 at 21:08 | #83
  84. June 27th, 2015 at 04:34 | #84
  85. June 27th, 2015 at 11:20 | #85
  86. June 27th, 2015 at 14:08 | #86
  87. June 27th, 2015 at 20:00 | #87
  88. June 28th, 2015 at 03:59 | #88
  89. June 28th, 2015 at 13:36 | #89
  90. June 28th, 2015 at 17:18 | #90
  91. June 29th, 2015 at 02:53 | #91
  92. June 29th, 2015 at 05:59 | #92
  93. June 29th, 2015 at 21:55 | #93
  94. June 30th, 2015 at 22:39 | #94
  95. July 1st, 2015 at 03:01 | #95
  96. July 1st, 2015 at 06:15 | #96
  97. July 1st, 2015 at 15:03 | #97
  98. July 1st, 2015 at 15:10 | #98
  99. July 1st, 2015 at 23:14 | #99
  100. July 1st, 2015 at 23:16 | #100
  101. July 1st, 2015 at 23:28 | #101
  102. July 2nd, 2015 at 10:58 | #102
  103. July 2nd, 2015 at 11:27 | #103
  104. July 2nd, 2015 at 11:33 | #104
  105. July 2nd, 2015 at 11:42 | #105
  106. July 3rd, 2015 at 05:13 | #106
  107. July 3rd, 2015 at 06:00 | #107
  108. July 3rd, 2015 at 07:14 | #108
  109. July 3rd, 2015 at 08:49 | #109
  110. July 3rd, 2015 at 14:05 | #110
  111. July 3rd, 2015 at 15:39 | #111
  112. July 3rd, 2015 at 18:14 | #112
  113. July 3rd, 2015 at 22:36 | #113
  114. July 3rd, 2015 at 23:05 | #114
  115. July 3rd, 2015 at 23:31 | #115
  116. July 4th, 2015 at 00:52 | #116
  117. July 4th, 2015 at 03:55 | #117
  118. July 4th, 2015 at 04:38 | #118
  119. July 4th, 2015 at 16:12 | #119
  120. July 4th, 2015 at 18:07 | #120
  121. July 4th, 2015 at 18:29 | #121
  122. July 4th, 2015 at 19:41 | #122
  123. July 4th, 2015 at 19:48 | #123
  124. July 4th, 2015 at 23:58 | #124
  125. July 5th, 2015 at 12:23 | #125
  126. July 5th, 2015 at 13:51 | #126
  127. July 5th, 2015 at 14:29 | #127
  128. July 5th, 2015 at 19:13 | #128
  129. July 5th, 2015 at 19:33 | #129
  130. July 5th, 2015 at 23:59 | #130
  131. July 6th, 2015 at 01:03 | #131
  132. July 6th, 2015 at 06:21 | #132
  133. July 6th, 2015 at 06:39 | #133
  134. July 6th, 2015 at 06:59 | #134
  135. July 6th, 2015 at 10:19 | #135
  136. July 6th, 2015 at 12:35 | #136
  137. July 6th, 2015 at 13:13 | #137
  138. July 6th, 2015 at 15:17 | #138
  139. July 6th, 2015 at 23:55 | #139
  140. July 7th, 2015 at 06:14 | #140
  141. July 7th, 2015 at 07:12 | #141
  142. July 7th, 2015 at 09:40 | #142
  143. July 7th, 2015 at 16:26 | #143
  144. July 7th, 2015 at 19:27 | #144
  145. July 8th, 2015 at 01:11 | #145
  146. July 8th, 2015 at 02:57 | #146
  147. July 8th, 2015 at 03:53 | #147
  148. July 8th, 2015 at 13:01 | #148
  149. July 8th, 2015 at 14:22 | #149
  150. July 8th, 2015 at 18:16 | #150
  151. July 8th, 2015 at 18:54 | #151
  152. July 8th, 2015 at 22:14 | #152
  153. July 9th, 2015 at 02:35 | #153
  154. July 9th, 2015 at 02:36 | #154
  155. July 9th, 2015 at 02:36 | #155
  156. July 9th, 2015 at 03:02 | #156
  157. July 9th, 2015 at 03:54 | #157
  158. July 9th, 2015 at 04:21 | #158
  159. July 9th, 2015 at 09:55 | #159
  160. July 9th, 2015 at 12:46 | #160
  161. July 9th, 2015 at 13:33 | #161
  162. July 9th, 2015 at 19:59 | #162
  163. July 9th, 2015 at 21:06 | #163
  164. July 10th, 2015 at 08:01 | #164
  165. July 10th, 2015 at 09:45 | #165
  166. July 10th, 2015 at 11:10 | #166
  167. July 10th, 2015 at 11:18 | #167
  168. July 10th, 2015 at 11:51 | #168
  169. July 10th, 2015 at 14:57 | #169
  170. July 10th, 2015 at 16:34 | #170
  171. July 10th, 2015 at 18:21 | #171
  172. July 11th, 2015 at 00:23 | #172
  173. July 11th, 2015 at 00:24 | #173
  174. July 11th, 2015 at 00:25 | #174
  175. July 11th, 2015 at 01:47 | #175
  176. July 11th, 2015 at 03:10 | #176
  177. July 11th, 2015 at 07:07 | #177
  178. July 11th, 2015 at 08:50 | #178
  179. July 11th, 2015 at 11:09 | #179
  180. July 11th, 2015 at 12:28 | #180
  181. July 11th, 2015 at 13:26 | #181
  182. July 11th, 2015 at 23:02 | #182
  183. July 12th, 2015 at 04:07 | #183
  184. July 12th, 2015 at 08:58 | #184
  185. July 12th, 2015 at 13:57 | #185
  186. July 12th, 2015 at 17:29 | #186
  187. July 12th, 2015 at 21:00 | #187
  188. July 12th, 2015 at 21:31 | #188
  189. July 12th, 2015 at 21:48 | #189
  190. July 13th, 2015 at 11:43 | #190
  191. July 13th, 2015 at 11:56 | #191
  192. July 14th, 2015 at 10:27 | #192
  193. March 10th, 2016 at 11:37 | #193
  194. May 9th, 2016 at 20:33 | #194
  195. February 6th, 2017 at 01:00 | #195
  196. July 9th, 2017 at 01:28 | #196
  197. August 20th, 2018 at 14:39 | #197
You must be logged in to post a comment.